I think Jerome’s reasoning as reported by Markos for not making the Utah stop on the book tour for “Crashing the Gates†was classic, “I’m not coming to Utah!â€.
That’s OK, neither did the DNC or any presidential candidate from either party in the last cycle.
But Markos did, and he is very cool. I wish his visit had been coordinated with any of the recent democratic county conventions, fundraisers (Barney Frank) or candidate trainings, all of which have produced newly energized democrats and unprecedented turnouts.
Progressive Utah is alive and well, and nobody knows it. Markos was surprised to learn that ThankyouHarryTaylor.org - mentioned in the most recent issue of Rolling Stone Magazine – was given birth right here in Salt Lake by Greg Felice who bears an uncanny resemblance to Markos. See photo below.

The progressive Utah blogs dominate the space in Utah. Only four of us however, were there including Ethan Millard of SLC Spin and Bob Aagard of “The World According to Meâ€, and Robert Miller of Utah Amicus. Pictured below with our leader.

I’ve done my best to list ALL of the active Utah political blogs (see sidebar blogroll). Sadly, Oblogatory Anectdotes is the only conservative one. Sadder still is that Ken Bingham is MIA. I would not be surprised if he has gone underground while transitioning from Republican-talking-points regurgitator to born-again liberal as, despite the neocon stereotype of meany, he is one of the sweetest guys I know. You can see that duality in his the video here.
Something is happening in Utah. Between the kind spanking given to the 70% majority republican Utah Senate during floor debate, and the dramatic four-month slide in Bush’s Utah approval rating from 63%-55%, to the pro-democrat letter read from the pulpit of every LDS ward house this past March, Utah may well soon surrender it’s vaulted position as the reddest state in the nation.
Markos, tell Jerome he owes us.









#1 by Ted Kennedy’s Liver - April 26th, 2006 at 13:14
There is a little article in the current issue of the Economist on this book. I haven’t read it yet, but for those of you interested and don’t get the Economist, check your local magazine rack. It is only a 2 or 3 min read, unless you are at the Quickie Mart and you hear, This isn’t a lending Library.
#2 by Sheryl - April 26th, 2006 at 18:50
Markos so completely Rocks (as my daughter would say) and cute, bright, and REAL.
We should replace the donkey with his gorgeous face!
Thank markos for coming.
#3 by lrbergan - April 26th, 2006 at 21:54
I also had a wonderful time talking to the people I met at the Fiddler’s Elbow, but have a different opinion of Markos’s presentation. I wrote this about it.
Markos Moulitsas Zuniga of the very successful blog, The Daily KOS was in town today promoting his book about democratic grassroots and the internet called “Crashing The Gate†This book claims to be the route to a new “people-powered politics†to replace an “ineffective, incompetent, and antiquated†Democratic party. The book accurately discribes many of the issues we face.
As a big supporter of Howard Dean in the last election, I was very interested in seeing what ideas were being espoused by an active member of the Democratic internet movement. I stood in line with the book I had just purchased and when it was my turn to talk to Mr. Moulitsas, I told him congratulations on the tremendous success of his web site.
We shook hands as I asked him to be sure and cover the voting machine issue on his website this year. He seemed to want to downplay the danger of the machines saying that they didn’t really need Diebold because they had other ways of causing problems. Since he has a law degree, I think he only wanted to touch on the problems that have already been widely proven. I don’t know if he had heard of the Diebold lawsuits, but sensing his discomfort with the topic, I had my book signed and moved on. I knew I would still probably have a chance to ask him something in front of the audience.
Because Mr. Moulitsas is such a hot topic these days, it was good of him to show up in our red Utah neighborhood. Other then outwardly chastising Senator Leiberman (a big crowd pleaser), and a couple of profanities during the speech, his demeanor seemed to please the crowd for the most part, but for me things went downhill pretty fast!
I don’t think Karl Rove could have done a better job of making the Republican party look strong, by repeatedly saying that Republicans have the ability to motivate, inspire, “hit them in the heart†and get them out to the polls, while Democrats are ineffective, uninterested, unlikely to vote, and for lack of a better word in the body of this message, doomed! He even said that he didn’t sense there was any way Democrats could win in 2006, or even 2008. Apparently we’re going to “Crash The Gate†VERY SLOWLY!
Early in the presentation, Moulitsas repeatedly said that despite the fact that people did not like George Bush and did not think the country was headed in the right direction, Democrats still lost. Finally, an audience member said “Kerry won†to which Moulitsas rolled his eyes and exaggeratedly and said “yeah right!†The chuckling died down quickley and I added my terse and unlawyerly “he didâ€. Agreement from this audience to either position could not be discerned.
I don’t know about you other Democrats out there, but I have to try, real hard, not to RAPTURE whenever somebody says the Democrats are going to have to work a lot harder if we ever want to WIN an election!
Calm down Larry.
The Democrats haven’t lost a presidential election since 1992. There, I said it!
The Democrats haven’t lost a presidential election since 1992. There, I said it again!
Mark Crispen Miller, (author of “Fooled Againâ€) is right. It’s not that you can’t prove the election WAS stolen, It’s that you can’t prove it WASN’T stolen. According to Miller, someone of stature will shortly come to the rescue of my credibility!
Of course it’s impossible to prove that an election has been stolen on a machine that only has to be unplugged to destroy the evidence. What CAN be proven though is that almost every election official in the United States is actively working to make sure that evidence will not be available. That’s the story here! Get on it journalists, I’m just an Optician!
When it was my turn to ask a question I offered “Why do you think the exit polls in Keiv Russia work so much better then they do in the United States?†His ready answer was “it’s a methodology issueâ€
Pause……
Gee, Edison/Mitofsky, that was some shoddy work there in 2004! I wouldn’t take that if I were you! Stand up and fight!
Mr. Moulitsas, for the sake of argument, lets agree that not one vote was stolen using a voting machine programmed to do that. It’s obvious that just about every method imaginable WAS used. If you are going to place your movement at the forefront of Democratic election success, you have got to place election fraud information at the center of your strategy. I categorically disagree with your pronouncement that Democrats aren’t working hard enough! I do agree that they are becoming less motivated!
As for myself, excuse me, but I have to drive an ice pick into my thigh (Comic relief imagery courtesy Mike Malloy (Air America Radio) who also coined this word that I hope the Democrats never have to use again!)
Anticipointment.
#4 by Sheryl - April 26th, 2006 at 21:55
Thank you for expressing your perception, this site gets pretty boring if we all nod in unison. I heard Markos say very clearly that in his opinion the only safe and sane way to vote is to use absentee ballots. He also stated that this will foil attmpts by the opposition to use last minute pushes for votes by increasing the window to 14 days. Also, he noted that his being pessimistic in the changes that need to occur in progressive Democrat strategy demonstrates his own fears of being too positive vis a vis his views of the past two elections. While I was getting his “autograph” I told him that I am very enthusiastic about the changes in Utah this election cycle. I believe that we are going to elect more Democrats to the legislature this year, and that Utah is a”purple” state. He wrote in my book that I should keep up the fight for “this purple State”. I still loved the guy. He had so much to say about the changes we are accomplishing from the bottom up, from the people vs. the “leaders in Washington, DC.”
#5 by Deanna Taylor - April 27th, 2006 at 05:33
Thank you for promoting this event. Many of us just can’t do/attend everything but enjoy hearing about it all!
#6 by Bob - April 27th, 2006 at 09:23
I think Democrats in Utah are reading way too much into the LDS Church’s announcement made before March’s Caucuses. It simply said that “Principles compatible with the gospel may be found in the platforms of all major political parties.” This isn’t a shocker nor a ground shaker. It simply says that there are compatible things in all political parties’ platforms. I think Mromons already understood this. The real question is what are the big issues that they’re going to base their vote on. If it continues to be based on social conservative principles, then most Mormons will continue to vote Republican. Sorry.This announcement is not going to open the flood gates of Utahns voting Democrat. It’s not as if Mormons across the state were voting Republican when in fact they really wanted to vote for Democrats but were waiting for the go ahead from the Church. If anything increases the amount of Utahns that vote Democrat this year, it will be due to the follies made by those currently in power. That’s the bottom line. Mormons knew they could vote Democrat long ago…that’s why my Grandpa always does.
#7 by Nephi - April 27th, 2006 at 09:58
Bob,
Then why issue the statement at all?
IMO, the statement reflects increasing nervousness with the Bush administration and is somewhat analogous to the increasing number of high-ranking defections. The Mormon church simply doesn’t want to be the last to defect.
There is more to the statement than merely reciting old, well-understood policy.
#8 by Bob Aagard - April 27th, 2006 at 11:16
BTW, the earlir Bob who commented wasn’t me.
-Bob
#9 by Cliff - April 27th, 2006 at 14:34
Actually Bob (not Aagard) I have it on good authority church leadership is actually quite concerned not just about the stereotype that LDS are Republicans and the poor governance of imbalance, but also the lay use of church authority in local politics.
The church has absolutely extended its hand to the Utah Democratic Party. They understand well the importance of the separation of church and state, and they are very uncomfortable with the religious overtones in some of the political rhetoric in this state. That is what good leadership is about. I applaud the church for this.
But then they turn around and support the marriage amendment. I think Monson is flexing his muscle or something like that (I really have no idea).
#10 by Jenni - April 27th, 2006 at 20:38
Wish I could have been there — I had a parent meeting for my daughter’s class that night (the last for the year). It’s tough staying on top of all that’s happening.
#11 by Cliff - April 27th, 2006 at 21:59
I know you’re trying. Your daughter comes first. We bachelors will pull up the slack, but you are a long length of it.
Steal my links in the am. I will have everyting there is before I leave for for Wesely Cowans funderal around 9am
The Scum Orrin Hatch will be at the capitol spewing his bullshit at noon.
#12 by Lawrence Buhler - April 28th, 2006 at 09:13
I attended the “Crashing the Gate” book-signing and was impressed by Markos’ presentation. I sensed the natural tension among the progressives in the group on issues, personalities, etc. It felt like a Democratic Party meeting with one big difference. This group is going to win in the long run. I’m a proud member of this group. I agree with Markos that Democrats may not see big gains, especially in the House on account of expert gerrymandering, BUT I hope we are wrong. Today’s Kos’ reports of a potential major Republican sex scandal could be the killer-scandal that allows Democrats to gain power.
btw: John Saltas of the City Weekly-Private Eye wrote an excellent comment about Enron and other sad things as well as good things like Markos and the DailyKos.
#13 by DEMDIVA - April 29th, 2006 at 19:53
It was so fine to see and feel all the energy at the Fiddler’s Elbow during the Markos Crashing the Gates event. Tension in the ranks does exist, as in any group or family structure. Rob Miller lives the old “W” adage: “Bring us together”, he talks about Human Values, not “Republican” or “Democrat” values. That’s the way to go. People like him will win over the fearful and “in the closet” Democrats. No shame, if you see a man like Rob who is proud to be a Mormon AND a Democrat..
#14 by DEMDIVA - April 29th, 2006 at 19:55
They DO look alike! I’m so glad you noticed it, too. I was kinda creeped out by the twins separated at birth deal, but thank god they are both good looking. Can you imagine Two Orrin Hatches???