Truth . . . Lies . . . Sexuality
This article from The Witness succinctly states the core of the Mark Foley scandal. Money quote:
. . . Foley lived in the closet. When it profited him, he cooperated with his party’s exploitation of cultural homophobia to gain power. And now Foley finds himself to be expendable to his party; he profited from their strategy of scapegoating queers, and apparently not realizing how that strategy would make him the perfect fall guy for party strategists to blame once his behavior came to light.
Like Ted Haggard, Foley was useful until he wasn’t - then he was tossed aside without a second thought; in Haggard’s case, the right will continue to use him if he lets them “fix” his sexual orientation.
The key quote from today’s Tribune on this topic:
That’s the fallacy social conservatives miss. In a culture that allows gay people room to be gay people, there is no need of lies. In a culture that does not - i.e., theirs - lies are rampant. And that’s unfortunate, not simply for the person in question, but for all the people in his or her life.
Ted Haggard and Mark Foley traded honesty for power, influence, prestige, wealth. Both men got caught and their lies held up for the world to see. Both men were victims and perpetrators in communities in which acceptance required dishonesty. Lying became second nature to them because it was required. Honesty meant destruction and lying meant another day of safety. The perpetrator and victim were one in the same. The blame is sufficient in quantity to go around - these men engaged in illegal, immoralt acts but the community in which they lived expected their dishonesty and preferred it and certainly that community shares the blame. Both men imploded, their lives certainly shaken to the foundation, if not completely ruined. I have empathy for them, but not sympathy.
By contrast, Neil Patrick Harris came out, got some news coverage, end of story. Most people I know responded by saying, “Well duh!” and went back to their daily lives. Ted Haggard and Mark Foley are punch lines. Neil Patrick Harris will go on with his life and career.
A person doesn’t come out, a famliy comes out. Parents must acknowledge their gay children - and face the too often explicitly asked question “What did you do wrong?” Siblings must come out - acknowledge their brother or sister’s orientation and face the possible loss of friends, uncomfortable, even rude questions. Society shames gay man and lesbian woman - and it shames their families. It asks, “What is wrong with you?” If sexual orientation is the result of bad parenting, then the entire family is suspect when a child is gay. It’s almost easier to cut a child or sibling out of one’s life - to make them the sole carrier of the burden shame - to retain one’s standing in the community than it is to face the questions. The child becomes ungrateful of the good parenting they received and the parents become blameless. The price of bigotry is too high.
When I was about 11 or 12, a neighbor’s son came out to his family. His father and brothers beat the holy living shit out of him and threw him out of the house. The tragically predictable coda came when I was in college. The gay son returned home to die from AIDS. The price of bigotry is too high, the victims of bigotry too many. I think I may have met my neighbor’s son. Once. I don’t remember him as a person. His story, however, continues to haunt me. I have never felt even a moment of sympathy for his parents. Their loss strikes me as trivial and self-inflicted. If they suffer, it is because of their own bigotry.
Here in Utah, our conservative majority doesn’t even seem to know the fallacy exists. I know too many gay men in Utah who have gone through Hell because of the Mormon church’s teachings on sexualty to be nice about it. I have heard one too many stories about gay teens being thrown out of their homes and left to live on the street to care about the niceties. Anti-gay bigotry is a cancer on our society. The price is paid in many ways by many people - Mark Foley and the pages he preyed on, Ted Haggard and his family and his church, my neighbor, people I know, friends at church. At what point will the price become so high that our conservative neighbors finally change?
Glenden Brown
November 13th, 2006 at 4:56 pm
Enough of your pro fabulous people drivel. Like we are going to think fabulous people are natural based upon your little article.
Look moron, fabulous people harm themselves. They need to be institutionalized.
What if you saw somebody on the street cutting up their face with a razor blade? Wouldn’t you call for help and have the dumb ass committed?
Same goes for fabulous people except they do even more harm to themselves (aids, angel warts, caprosi sarcoma, ripping of angels, angels warts on mouth). Face it. These f—- are sick and you are just encouraging them. You are not better than someone who would let the face slasher just keep on slashing. “Hey dude, it’s a freedom of choice issue”.
Wake up. Stop the spread of angel warts.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:01 pm
Furthermore, Foley and that fabulous preacher were outed for the convenience of the dem election strategy.
Everyone knows that Foley has been queering, or attempting to queer, the pages for over three years. Why release the info just before the election? The same thing only double for the fabulous preacher. They were outed to deprive the repubs of the ability to claim the moral high ground. I mean bush was leaving his spiritual development to a fabulous preacher on meth who was getting his blank blanked in the most perverted manner.
I’m sure you censor these posts so my only comment is “Moderate this b—-”.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:11 pm
The line between satire and seriousness is so very thin . . .
November 13th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
Meryl Cook (as if it weren’t obvious) is Unitary Anne. I have taken the liberty of replacing the word fag in his posts with “fabulous people.”
November 13th, 2006 at 5:29 pm
Having spent the past 4 of a 20 year career working with closeted, mostly married gay men, I must say, I see a clear pattern in Meryl’s outbursts.
By contrast, I have yet to meet a man who is comfortable with his expressed sexuality who is at the same time threatened by gay men.
But Meryl there is good news for you. A life of freedom, happiness and good, good luvin is right around the corner. You need only ask.
November 16th, 2006 at 1:26 pm
Well, I have always stated to homophobes, considering that gay men would likely be boinking women, if they weren’t doing each other. What is there to complain about? Gay men are working for you by increasing the odds. More women for the hetero male. Of course this works in reverse for lesbians who are limiting the pool for straight males.
Long live the bis that are ***king everyone!, and for glendons sake, wear a condom.
November 17th, 2006 at 2:45 pm
Very nicely put, Glen.
I had an urge today to google your name even though I haven’t thought about you in a long time, and I was happy to find this very timely and articulate post by you.
I remember you fondly from Grinnell, which seems like a thousand years ago — and fortunately we’ve all come a long way since then.
November 17th, 2006 at 4:19 pm
Hey Brett! Grinnell has been much on my mind lately - reunion year apparently. I feel old. Hope all is well with you!
September 12th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
It is! (He says ten months later). I’m sure I won’t remember to check here again for another ten months. I’m on ol’ addictive Facebook though, assuming you remember how to spell my atrociously Germanic last name, and why would you. Or wait, my e-mail above is visible to you. Best regards, Brett