“Terry Schiavo Republicans”

Over at tompaine.com, Paul Waldman has an intriguing article about the important dynamic of this year’s election - conservatism repudiated.

Waldman writes:

After Lyndon Johnson made Democrats the party of civil rights, a grand exodus occurred among conservative Southerners from their traditional home in the Democratic Party to their ideological home in the GOP. As a consequence, the power center among Republicans migrated southward. It was in the 1990s that Southerners finally took over the GOP leadership, as Robert Michel of Illinois and Bob Dole of Kansas were replaced by Newt Gingrich of Georgia and Trent Lott of Mississippi. (It should surprise no one that Republican senators put aside their squeamishness about those who pine for the days of Jim Crow to bring Lott back into the leadership.)

. . . Try to find a representative of the once-powerful “Rockefeller Republicans”—they’re an endangered species. Indeed, there is only one Republican Congressman left in all of New England (emphasis mine). It was the Republican moderates who lost, not just in the Northeast, but across the country.

. . . the most important result of the shift that took place is symbolic. The election shrank the Republican Party, both geographically and ideologically. Their identity will continue to be defined by their most socially conservative, Southern members, who will oppose popular initiatives like increasing the minimum wage and fight unending battles on hot-button social issues in which they inevitably alienate large swaths of voters who call themselves “moderate” but think like progressives.

Conservatives have already begun attempting to argue that George W. Bush is no real conservative; that argument is nothing more than positioning for the next “true conservative” to come along and has no basis in reality. The conservative movement has gotten almost its entire laundry list from Bush - massive military spending, war with Iraq, conservative judges who will overturn Roe v. Wade, then Griswold, Bush has advocated intelligent design, given government money to churches, and backed bans on same sex marriage. With the help of the rubber stamp Republicans, George W. Bush has governed as a letter perfect conservative. We need to drive home that point, again and again and again.

Waldman takes his argument one step further:

It’s all well and good to celebrate the defeat of Rick Santorum, but it would actually serve Democrats’ long-term interests far more to find a way to defeat his Pennsylvania colleague Arlen Specter when he comes up for re-election. Moderates like Specter put a mainstream face on the GOP; Santorum, on the other hand, convinced voters that Republicans are nuts every time he went on a tirade about “man on dog” sex.

The few moderates left in the Republican party are a very endangered species these days. When the hard right isn’t gunning for them, they have to run away from their party to win elections. In some sense, if the Republican party continues its trajectory, it will only have the Rick Santorum’s and Trent Lotts - that’s what we want - then the Republican party’s full hypocrisy will be on display:

The party that claimed it would “get government off your back” was reaching one hand into your bedroom and the other into your hospital room.

It is the Terri Schiavo Republicans that voters in the interior West, the Southwest—and indeed, everywhere but the Deep South—are turning away from

Its social conservative wing has been running the Republican Party, funded by corporate conservatives. Social conservatives are increasingly turning against the corporate wing (regularly boycotting and protesting them for not fully kowtowing to the “family” agenda). Both have long since given up pretending they care about libertarians. The effect has been simply enough that the Republican has moved so far to the right that they have effectively abandoned the center. That vacuum has been filled in two ways - first, the Democrats have for long been desperate to be in the center that they were already there when the R’s stepped away, second, the majority of Americans actually hold liberal views on social issues. A large minority hold libertarian views and are more amenable to the Dems approach than the R’s. To keep the base happy, Republicans will have to take socially conservative positions and alienate the majority of American voters.

Waldman concludes with this passage that seems exactly right to me:

If the Democrats can succeed in furthering the GOP’s ideological and geographic isolation, they can send them into a vicious spiral of defeat, where they have to keep feeding their socially conservative, Southern base in order to avoid total annihilation, but their efforts to do so end up harming them in every other region of the country.

So how do you that?

First, target moderate Republicans and tar them with their party affiliation. Make them wear the Republican “R” like a modern day scarlet letter.

Second, never speak ill of another Democrat unless he/she is corrupt. Then, attack them for their corruption, call for their resignations. Support their opponents in the primary.

Third, keep up the 50 state strategy. You can’t win if you don’t play. Contest every seat. It works - Mark Foley was secure in his seat. His resignation delivered that district to a Democrat. Tom Delay was secure before the full extent of his corruption was known. Nick Lampson, Democratic Congressman, will represent that district starting in 2007.

Fourth, and finally, invest in the grassroots. Community activists make great candidates and then great elected officials. And they become the farm team for other seats. Today’s city council member is tomorrow’s state legislator and next year’s congressional candidate. The grassroots have passion, ideas, energy, and enthusiasm. They’ll lose a fight this year and come back next year. Rather than running away from the liberal grassroots, the Dems should embrace us. In my experience, liberal grassroots community activists are both idealists and pragmatists. They’ll take 25% of a win because it’s better than a 100% loss, they’ll head back to their headquarters and start strategizing on how they can build on that 25%. Strengthen the grassroots today and tomorrow the state and national parties will be stronger.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

10 Responses to ““Terry Schiavo Republicans””

  1. Caveat Says:

    Hello, excuse me if I sound a little silly here, but I thought that a ‘Terry Schaivo Republican’ was a repub who was perfectly healthy…except for the fact that they were BRAIN DEAD. I know this is unfair to Terry, and I almost withheld this, but that was my impression. By brain-dead, I mean that they may as well not have brains, in as much as the Bush-Cheney Axis of ______, provided all the ‘constructive’ mentation, while the ‘T. S.’ Republican true believers simply ‘rubber-stamped’. That might be one way to run a world, but there really ought to be someone at the helm with a functioning brain to begin with. For all this I thank the voters, and the Supreme court. As for the residue of the once proud Republican Party, I would councel them to look hard at the administrations of Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Gw I and GW43, and do something very, very different, if you ever get another shot @ it.

  2. Andys' Whip! Says:

    Only in America would republicans strive to keep a person alive that had vegetated by her own hand, while at the very same time POISONING the entire middle east with depleted uranium, and dropping bombs indiscriminately enough to lead to the deaths of thousands of young children.

    This does not even take into account the willful denial of life sustaining goods perpetrated by clinton and bush during the interval between gulf 1 and gulf 2, which led to countless deaths of childen.

    There is going to be an adult swim at the Lake says God. THE LAKE OF FIRE! Don’t forget everyone to wear your bush/cheney buttons. A warm time will be had by all.

  3. Caveat Says:

    Whipman, you’re right about ’sanctions’ during the Clinton years. (And so much more).

    But as for the ‘LAKE OF FIRE’ experience. Don’t tempt me….it’s 06 degrees out there. My God. brrrr.

    Fire…Ice…what’s the difference?

  4. SATAN Says:

    Ah yea fools, do you not know me?

    Have you any idea of my power? I have very little silly meatballs. For it is God that have the power over you, and hath then given it to yourselves. The one power I possess is that of DECEPTION!. I cannot drag you to hell, you must walk to the PIT YOURSELF!! You must choose to be one of my minions. This occurs upon fascination of the material world, for GOD offers you eternity though you cannot see it. I offer you sin, disease, and corruption, and you CHOOSE IT!

    In return I give you your earthly desires, temporary though they may be.

    Yes, my many names, Beelzebub, “Ol Scratch, Prince of Darkness, and on and on, are imprinted on your psyches, but are only reflections of your material earthly selves. You make the descision I made in sin, to reject IAMTHATIAM, to rule whatever the alternative is, as my ego is insatiable and has no means of being quelled.

    I made money, I made interest, which upon reflection of Gods words is a mortal SIN! The entire western culture is engaged in this. It is “good” to earn interest, though it is not permitted by the Judeo Christian GOD! You walk to my beachfront YOURSELVES FOOLS!

    Your current mortal enemy, those of Islam, claim the same God of Abraham as you do, yet they honor the call to deny usury. Their banks collect no interest, nor do they pay any, as IAMTHATIAM DEMANDS! No wonder the battle is fierce. All commit sin, but as even your little ones have interest bearing bank accounts, THEY ARE ALL MINE!!! Have a nice walk.

  5. Caveat Says:

    F*ck you. U R THAT U R = B.S.

  6. God Says:

    So you say caveat, btw it’s glenn.

    If he has exacted usury Or taken increase — Shall he then live? He shall not live! If he has done any of these abominations, He shall surely die; His blood shall be upon him. (Ezekiel 18:13)

    Caveat, buyer beware, but do not lend upon increase, as this is as sure the path to death.

    You believe not., satans’ warning is for those that believe.

  7. caveate mcEmptor Says:

    Glen, I suspected it was you. So I take back the Friedman Unit. Here, a problem does arise. That is that, IF you’re aka aka aka, and Hurricane anne is aka and aka, then that makes this blogs role of inputees at… nine, maybe twelve people. Now that’s scary.

  8. glenn Says:

    I wear many hats.

  9. Caveat Says:

    That sterling intellect comes shining through from under each of them. Peace.

  10. Cliff Says:

    The Trinity revealed….or are those furry hats?

Leave a Reply

Quicktags: