Educational Reform

As part of an earlier discussion, Caveat asked:

“How do we steer our ponderous educational contraption towards a more humane and less fundamentalist, path?”

With regard to public education, it’s important to understand that there is a swath of the American public that distrusts public education. To these folks, education is problematic because it teaches things they don’t believe - like evolution and gender equality and the facts about human sexuality. For these folks, education is strictly practical - you go to school to get job training. These are folks who periodically whine and cry about “liberal” professors indoctrinating their children (i.e. teaching them the facts rather than biblical myths).

On a relatively regular basis, there is a wingnut eruption over some issue. The case last year in Dover, PA where a judge effectively smacked a bunch of creationist down is a good example; the case had been bubbling below the surface for at least 18 months before it blew up publicly; conservatives lost and that loss still stings and they’re vowing to keep fighting despite a resounding and public defeat. Currently, in a Delaware county, a group of paleo conservatives are fighting tooth and nail to get a sexuality curriculum that teaches only what they approve. They keep losing but they keep fighting. The fight is always the same - it’s part of the fundamentalist war on modernity - and it just moves from place to place. These are the folks who run organizations like the Utah Eagle Forum. You can count on them to claim they’re speaking for “real” Americans.

In Frank Rich’s What’s the Matter with Kansas, he describes the plen-t-plaint - there’s always some outrage over something that this portion of the populace is upset about. It may “promotion of homosexuality” through GSA’s or diversity education. It may be promoting promiscuity through providing teens with contraception and accurate medical information. Or, as happened in the Northwest (h/t to republicoft) objecting to public schools showing Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth because it is not (I shit you not) unbiblical. Forty years ago, this same portion of the public was starting private “Christian” schools to keep their little white kids from sitting next to little black kids in public schools. It’s not as if their fight is noble or particularly praiseworthy. It is however consistently a fight against any form of modernity, change, or diversity.

In terms of numbers, these folks represent somewhere between 10 and 30% of the public. But they are frighteningly well organized, fanatical to the point of “Dude you’re fucking scary”, relentless and more than a little amoral.

And these folks have thrown themselves screaming in front of progress in public education. Their superior organization has allowed them to dominate the Republican party in many places - our much benighted Utah included. As a result, even in Utah, elected Republicans are more conservative than the public that elected them. Two aspects have certainly benefited these folks - the first is amazing mis-competence of the media. IOW, despite the fact that a majority of Americans favor some form of legal recognition of same sex couples, the media presents the debate in absolute black and white terms; someone asking for same couples to have legal marriage usually ends up debating someone like Gayle Ruzicka who believes same sex couples shouldn’t even exist and all gay folk should get themselves to Evergreen ASAP. The second aspect has been the absolute failure of the progressive movement in America in the last forty years. Culturally, progressives may be winning, but politically no generation of American progressives has been less capable of effective political organizing and campaigning than the baby boomers. It’s no accident that the leading conservative politicians are all baby boomers - Gingrich, Santorum, Bush, Huckabee, McCain - while progressive baby boomers produced the triangulating Clintons.

To get back to Caveat’s question, what do we do now?

It’s important to know what we’re asking for and what we’re not willing to settle for. In terms of sexuality education, we’re asking for comprehensive, medically accurate, age appropriate curriculum. We know from real world experience that abstinence only fails abjectly and completely fails. In terms of science education, we want actual science taught in our schools. Creationism, whether or not its under that label Intelligent Design, Old Earth Creationism, or Young Earth Creationism, is mythology and religion dressed in scientific language, but it’s not scientific. It’s formalized ignorance, but it is ignorance nonetheless.

It is finally starting to happen, but progressives are bringing some level of organizational competence to creating a broad based progressive movement. Organizationally, progressives have far too long relied on single issue organizations and for far too long, have consistently failed to be effective. Conservatives, as Paul Waldman reminds us, have effectively created a broad based movement. This movement sees the vital connections between the single issues and acts on all of them while consistently constructing the arguments in favor of the overarching conservative movement. While representing a minority view in the US, conservatives nevertheless have built a political majority. Progressives need to learn this lesson. Reproductive health and freedom, gender equality, economic justice, rights for sexual minorities, racial justice and religious freedom are all connected; fighting anti-choice judges, for instance, would be far more effective if we make the case that reproductive freedom isn’t just about abortion. Read what conservatives have to say about the “contraceptive mentality” and privacy rights you know conservatives don’t believe abortion is the ultimate end of the fight.

Finally, the biggest battle will be against public official beholden to the most conservative elements of American society. Gayle Ruzicka always gets what she wants - not because she’s right but because most of our legislators are scared trouserless of the old witch. She’s ruthless, amoral, organized and does not pretend to be nice, civil, or pleasant. Go to a school board public forum and you will hear the loudest voices from the most conservative people - they may be in the minority even at the meeting but they’ll scream the loudest. Elected officials hear those voices and think they speak for a majority. And because conservative organizations are such tight ships, they get their people out far more effectively than do the rest of us.

We have to take over ineffective progressive organizations, we have to get people out and we have to be personally active. We have to write letters, make phone calls, and make our voices heard and get better people elected. And that is how we answer Caveat’s question - with action.

6 Responses to “Educational Reform”

  1. Jesse Harris Says:

    In essence, we have a group of people who are immovable in their beliefs and convinced of their rightness seeking to use the public education system for indoctrination regardless of what the parents of the children think.

    Funny, that applies to you as well as the people you detract. What exactly makes your form of dictatorship more palatable? Is it because you’re “right” and they’re not? The other side is convinced of the exact same thing. You’re no better than they are.

  2. Caveat Says:

    If it is about abortion, why are the embrios protected, when thousands of other innocents are simply killed in our efforts to secure oil and a gilded legacy for the commander in chief. Do we thwart abortion for the soldiers that will result?

    Gayle R. is no dummy. What would sway her? can she truely believe that she is right on every issue? Has she learned anything new in the last twentyfive years except organizing knowhow?

    The broad-based conservative movement still seems to be based altogether too strongly on things that science can easily rend, leaving me to conclude that many of us are unwilling to accept that reality can be anything other than what is stated in the static dogma-texts. They forget that there have always been new faces and ideas answering the evolving challenges of the forward-rushing NOW. Challenges that the same old shit cannot address. The texts suggest that there is a time for every season…my guess that it’s evolution season about now. Step up all.

    Given all this, people who’s goal is to unstick the status quo and ‘evlove’ need to be careful how they talk to the Ruzikas of this world. Ranting might be a turnoff. Talking down, the same. But dialog, with apologies for seeming to know, have to occur, and in dialoging, there’s the chance that our own attitudes can shift as well. But since they’re really not that scarey, it’s worth a try. Look at what we’ve all learned from Frank and Annie and Cassandra. Immeasurable.

    Thanks to you all. Thank you, Glendon.

  3. George R. Kalen Says:

    One small correction. Thomas Frank wrote What’s The Matter With Kansas, a superb political analysis. Frank Rich writes Sunday columns for the New York Times from the perspective of politics as theater. Also excellent stuff, for very different reasons.

  4. Glenden Brown Says:

    George - thanks! When I wrote that it looked wrong but my copy of What’s the Matter With Kansas was at home and I was at the coffee shop. Proof reading is a virtue I need to acquire.

    Caveat - dialog is tough and is tried far too infrequently. Many conservative start by feeling attacked and in turn go on the attack. Teachers groups, public education advocates and others immediately respond by attacking back. And so the cycle keeps going.

  5. Cliff Lyon Says:

    Ambassador of Caveat,

    How goes the dialog with Jessie Harris?

    In the spirit of ex-Ambassador Bolton, we would do well to cut the first 5 inches of leg right out from under Ms. RuZika and no one would notice.

    As much as Mr. Harris would like to equate the extreme right with the mainstream left, a rationale survey of the debate suggests an analogy more like “ships passing in the night” .

    The proponents of these harmless clubs that foster dialog among peer with the common goal of creating an atmosphere of tranquility, acceptance and respect if not a celebration of diversity and tolerance, are unsurprisingly, students and teachers who speak from daily experience in the real world where students, believe it or not, want to understand one another’s differences (right or wrong). They WANT to understand why gay James seems not nearly so sick and evil as Daddy says. They want to see for themselves if Mom’s admonitions to Dad for being homophobic might be justified.

    Jessie, remember when you were that age? Did you think yourself too immature to decide for yourself if it were unsafe for you to be in a school with GSA’s? Did YOU really think it best to defer to your parents on ANY subject? Have you forgotten the one indisputable fact that Mom and Dad had NO IDEA what school “is really like”?

    Jesse, are you becoming your father already? Your use of the word “indoctrination” has no basis in reality. A simple survey of actual high school students would reveal that. Use of the word “indoctrination” is classic fear-mongering. The suggestion that the proponents of acceptance and dialog are “seeking to use the public school system” to create more gay kids is akin to suggesting that people who thought black people should hold the priesthood are sodomites. Both are dishonest and subject to the harshest of rebukes by our Father in heaven.

    Take careful note: the opponents of GSA’s are not students and teachers. If they DO have children in Utah high schools, they are out of sync with them and their teachers.

    And it is likely that none of the opponents of GSA’s have any empathy much less witnessed the effects on entire school when the few and the mean spew words like faggot, dike, and fudge packer as freely and loudly as time and opportunity permit.

    So Jesse, it is not about indoctrination, it is about civility and the right of ALL polite kids to go to school to learn and develop an intellectual curiosity that will serve them throughout their lives and by extension, their communities.

    There’s nothing quite like listening the actual “dial0g” as the Ambassador of Caveat favors. A fair estimation of the audio of the comments will confirm the “ships passing in the night” analogy, but for one subtle difference, one ship is a small one run a aground long ago with no radio contact with the mainland, stubbornly resolved that as with Noah, a special flood will lift the ship from its grave (if not melting glaciers).

    …while the other ship, confidently steams by on course to the next port, their offers of help rejected.

  6. Caveat Says:

    G’morning Cliff. Jessie who?

    Interesting that at this very moment, it the Sunday trib editorial section, there’s an article by Troy Williams, reflecting on all this. This sort of outpouring, always amazes me. Go read.