The Pyramid of Irrational Ignorance
People who know me know that I love the model of thinking known as the pyramid of rational ignorance. This model essentially says in a world of information overload, people rationally choose to not know things they don’t need to know to lead their lives.Â
One of the most common complaints in the blogosphere concerns the raving, endless incompetence of the national media on political issues. The media breathlessly reports right wing talking points as if they’re facts, repeats swift boating charges, even when they’re patently, demonstrably untrue. John at Americablog, for instance, is all over CNN’s complete failure on the Speaker of the House’s travel problems with the Pentagon; some networks reported the facts, not CNN which simply repeated untruths invented by Republicans and their lapdogs in the Pentagon. Again and again, the national media believes presenting both sides of an issue is the same as unbiased reporting - even if one of those sides (almost always the conservative side) is lying, distorting, misrepresenting or simply inventing reality. In a week in which Republicans have blocked debate about Iraq in the Senate, in which 11 Americans were killed in Iraq in 48 hours, in which the Scooter Libby trial is going on, during which the President delivered an insane budget the national media is managing to report competently on . . .
The Death of Anna Nicole Smith. (Don’t believe me? CNN MSNBC  and CBSNEWS have issues of her death as their top stories on their websites as of 10:15 a.m. today.)
If you look back over the last ten years, the media have spent massive, inordinate amounts of energy on issues such as Monica Lewinsky, Chandra Levy, Ted Haggard, a bunch of missing white girls, and celebutantes. They’ve barely managed to talk about policy - the Iraq war? It’s complicated and difficult. The budget? Complicated and difficult. Civil rights? Complicated and difficult. Actually reporting on these things requires challenging politicans, refusing to accept their spin and their talking points, doing in depth research and hours and hours of preparation. It’s hard work and if you offend someone, they may not talk to you again since everyone else is giving them puff pieces and fluff questions.
The Media has done an amazingly detailed job on Anna Nicole Smith’s death - they’ve talked knowledgeably about drugs and autopsies and scandals around her marriage, divorce, and child. Why? Because these things are easy.  You can easily bloviate about the issues without much or any real work.Â
If the real media - not Faux News - were to do their jobs, you’d see Republicans only on Fox. Not as a result of media bias, but as a result of not being able to get away with their spin anywhere else. When Atrios asks why the media can’t seem to graps the simple notion that 70% of Americans are opposed to the surge and that is the mainstream viewpoint, it’s not a rhetorical question. Understanding that simple fact would require our national media to actually challenge George W. Bush and his enablers on matters of fact. And the media as an institution, is constitutionally incapable of demonstrating such backbone. Anna Nicole’s death is easy. Real reporting, real journalism, is hard work. It is - or can be - extremely adversarial and hostile. And most journalists desperately want to be popular - so they avoid the hostile, adversarial work of journalism.
Glenden Brown
February 9th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
The Bush administration and the media rely on most people barely paying attention. For example, there is no evidence at all that Iran has a nuclear weapons program. How many times a day do the TV talking heads mention the Iranian nuclear weapons program?
February 9th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
Glenden,
My first reaction as I’m trying to think of something to add to this thread, is that I can’t.
You’ve said it all, and I couldn’t agree more. The state of our paparazzi media is beyond embarrassing. I wonder if someday we will get all of our news from reputable weblogs.
February 9th, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Its not the journalist, its the networks. What should we expect from news programs that follow Oprah and precede Survivor and American Idol?
The time to “wonder if someday we will get all of our news from reputable weblogs” is past. Internet web blogs are the only resource for relevant and important information much less reliable information.
And despite popular criticism of such sources, the Internet is already at worst, more reliable than Big Media.
February 10th, 2007 at 5:49 am
But…only on the intertubes can I cherry-pick my info-loading with such left-wing bias.
February 10th, 2007 at 10:27 am
This is why there are blogs and bloggers. God bless us, one and all.
February 10th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Cliff,
When you wrote:
for a minute I thought I was reading a comment I had made! I think you’re right about web logs. It’s just that I’m not sure where they all are yet. (The reputable ones)
February 10th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Anna Nichol Smith sure cut into the Molly Ivins eulogy. The repubs probably offed her for that very purpose. (snark) Eh?