Murtha on the Iraq Accountability Act

John Murtha (D-PA)Why does President Bush threaten to veto an emergency supplemental appropriation that gives him all the money he asked for to finance military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and then some? One word: accountability.

Our president has taken our soldiers hostage, threatening to cut off their training, supplies, equipment and medical care unless Congress once again agrees not to hold his administration accountable. In other words, in exchange for another $100 billion, he won’t even promise to meet specific benchmarks for progress in the occupation of Iraq. When will the Iraqis be responsible for their own security? When will American combat units be withdrawn as our allies the British have already decided to do?

Most importantly, when can we begin the job of rebuilding the capabilities of our ground forces? Via the Huffington Post, Rep. John Murtha tells us:

I have just been informed that the 4th Infantry Division is preparing to deploy to Iraq with only eight months at home and without the appropriate training. This is unacceptable.

The stress on our military due to the manner in which the president has waged the war in Iraq is no longer tolerable.

Due to continuous and extended deployments to Iraq, our military is running out of troops and equipment and is being forced to abandon its own rotation and deployment guidelines in order to sustain the president’s war plan.

In short, our military has been forced to do too much with too little.

Our military readiness has deteriorated to levels not seen since Vietnam and our ability to fight future threats is severely compromised. Yet the president refuses to address this most vital issue.

In reaction to the disastrous manner in which the president has run the war, Congress passed the Iraq Accountability Act in both houses. This bill provides resources to address the readiness problem, puts the onus on the Iraqi Government to internally solve its own civil war and provides the beginnings of a safe and responsible return of our United States forces from Iraq.

The Constitution expressly places the power ‘to raise and support Armies,’ and ‘to provide and maintain a Navy’ with Congress. It is, therefore, Congress’ responsibility to raise the revenues for our military and to determine in what manner and by what means they shall be spent.

For four years, the president has been waging a war without end and without accountability. The Iraq Accountability Act expresses the sentiment of the Congress and the majority of the American people who say it’s time for a plan to safely and responsibly end the war.

Read previous posts about Rep. Murtha and the situation in Iraq.

UPDATE: Over at HuffPo, Tom Gilroy has another view: “When you strip away all the posturing and finger-pointing and spinning and grandstanding and punditry— basically the Democrats ratified the war plan W laid out in his Jan 10th speech, complete with the benchmarks.”

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

3 Responses to “Murtha on the Iraq Accountability Act”

  1. Marshall Says:

    Why did Matheson vote against this again?

  2. Richard Warnick Says:

    That’s a good question. Rep. Matheson helped amend the legislation to take out things Bush didn’t like, for example no attack on Iran without congressional authorization. Then he voted against the bill anyway.

  3. One Utah » Blog Archive » Democratic Post-Veto Strategy Says:

    [...] is why yesterday Bush threatened to veto not only the Iraq Accountability Act that Congress has already passed, but any and all future bills that contain a timetable for [...]

Leave a Reply

Quicktags: