General Petraeus the Man of the Year?


Via Think Progress: Bill O’Reilly declares General David Petraeus his Person of the Year, “by a wide margin.” National Review says Time ought to pick Petraeus for Man of the Year. OK then, let’s look at how this year went:

General David Petraeus

January: President George Bush promotes Petraeus to four-star rank and appoints him as the new commander of Multinational Force Iraq. In his Senate confirmation hearings, Petraeus sells the so-called “surge” as the only hope for progress– but makes no explicit promises except for a prediction of more casualties. Success is up to the Iraqi politicians, he says.

February: A new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq predicts that Iraqi leaders will be “hard pressed” to reconcile over the next 18 months. This means the stated goal of the so-called “surge” is a long shot at best.

March: In a meeting in Baghdad, Admiral Fallon, Petraeus’ superior as CENTCOM commander, told Petraeus to his face that he considered him to be “an ass-kissing little chickensh*t” and added, “I hate people like that.”

May: Congress enacts legislation to require the Iraqi government to meet 18 benchmarks first laid out in January. “The steps necessary for a credible government have been apparent for some time. Now the Iraqi Parliament is on notice to proceed without delay,” says Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC).

June: Petraeus says he sees “astonishing signs of normalcy” in half, perhaps two-thirds of Baghdad. A Pentagon report released at the same time concluded violence “has increased in most provinces, particularly in the outlying areas of Baghdad province…”

July: The Iraqi government has made no progress in achieving the benchmarks for success of the so-called “surge.” Their parliament goes on vacation for a month.

August: After reviewing an early draft of an updated Iraq National Intelligence Estimate, Petraeus succeeded in altering the document’s judgments about the levels of violence in Iraq. We learn that the much-touted “Petraeus Report” in September will actually be written by the White House PR staff.

September: Petraeus lied to Congress, claiming success for the so-called “surge.” Polls show a majority of Americans don’t believe his testimony is an honest assessment. In a moment of honesty, the general admitted that he did not know if the occupation of Iraq could make America safer.The New York Sun proposes that Petraeus run for president, despite his 24 percent approval rating.

November: Petraeus met with none other than Ahmed Chalabi, con artist extraordinary and an Iranian agent. Chalabi was appointed head of the services committee in the hope of bringing utility service to war-ravaged Baghdad neighborhoods. Meanwhile, no member of Congress has been allowed to read Petraeus’ Joint Campaign Plan.

December: 2007 has been the worst year since the Iraq invasion in terms of U.S. casualties, civilian casualties, and refugees.

UPDATE: Time Magazine has put Vladimir Putin on the cover as Person of the Year.

Iraq NewsLadder

Share Utah:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  1. #1 by WP - December 18th, 2007 at 12:31

    He will be the R party’s nominee in 2012, wait and see…

  2. #2 by Walt - December 18th, 2007 at 16:06

    Blackwater is still out there, and I have to wonder what kind of an ‘ass kissing little chickenshit’ would allow an army of unaccountable mercenaries to keep winning those hearts and minds (23 dead Iraqis at at time) during a war he is supposedly trying to win.

  3. #3 by Mark Towner - December 19th, 2007 at 02:30

    So Richard, do you want the US to fail in IRAQ? If you were President, what would you do?

  4. #4 by Richard Warnick - December 19th, 2007 at 07:02

    Mark, how do you define success in Iraq? How does the USA win an Iraqi civil war? If I were president, I would not have ordered an invasion of Iraq because it was unnecessary and no good outcome was possible. Not to mention a violation of international law that would cause our allies to abandon us. Failure was a foregone conclusion.

    George H.W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft saw this clearly. They wrote in 1998 that an invasion of Iraq and toppling of Saddam Hussein would leave us with no viable exit strategy and “incalculable political and human costs.” The USA would be “an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.”

    Where do we go from here? Multi-National Force-Iraq recently concluded that Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the U.S. military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them, and see the departure of occupying forces as the key to national reconciliation.

    Withdrawal is obviously the best course of action in terms of America’s national security. It’s what the Iraqis want. But our president won’t do it because he wants to pass on his fiasco to the next administration.

  5. #5 by caveat - December 19th, 2007 at 07:48

    He would also like to convince any later administrations that ‘further’ along this imperialistic road is the way out of any difficulties. Subdue the oil rich and face off w/any remaining adversaries (for we will then have the fuel – very last century thinking I’d say). He is as yet unconvinced that what he has done was a crime and / or a mistake. You see, He’s doing it all for us, the uh merican people. Success will be realized when somewhere down the line a Bush progeny is on the thrown of the whole wide uni-verse! I for one can’t wait for that day. Pity the commies / islam-o-targets, or others we can diminish who might be sitting on our oil.

  6. #6 by Tim - December 19th, 2007 at 15:50

    Wow, Towner throws down the “do you want the US to fail in IRAQ?” I thought even Limbaugh, Hannity, O’Reilly had given up on this BS argument. If he would read RWs’ consistent posts he would learn what a true patriot is, without trying to run him down.

    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/27/letterman-vs-oreillyround-twofight/

  7. #7 by Richard Warnick - December 19th, 2007 at 16:16

    I think he was channeling the Tom Cruise character in “Lions for Lambs.”

    Senator Jasper Irving: Do you want to win the War on Terror? Yes or no?…This is the quintessential yes-or-no question of our time.

  8. #9 by Mark Towner - December 19th, 2007 at 17:05

    Richard, where are the posts I made later today?

    Mark

  9. #10 by Richard Warnick - December 20th, 2007 at 08:20

    Mark, I looked at all the hidden comments and can’t find anything except spam.

(will not be published)
  1. No trackbacks yet.