To Bush administration chagrin and despite its best efforts to cover up the crime of 911, various independent investigations and courageous web warriors continue to expose Bush’s lies about 911.
A culprit, a fiendish cabal inside our own government, may yet be exposed to be mass murderers as well as war criminals, traitors, subversives, mass murderers and torturers. Bush’s ‘official conspiracy theory’ is full of holes. It’s a cover story!
If the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated or at least deliberately allowed by the Bush- Cheney administration and the Pentagon, then the motivation to cover up this murderous and treasonous act would be unlimited. No expenditure of time and money would be considered too great.”
–Professor David Ray Griffin [4]The True Story of 9/11: Part IV
Thus –Professor Griffen addresses the compelling motivation behind the Bush administration’s cover up, cover story, a scripted program of lies, felony obstruction of justice, and mass deception with regard to 911.
1. The ‘official theory’ that three airliners caused fires hot enough to bring down the Twin Towers of the WTC and damaged the Pentagon is a bald-faced lie.
It can be demonstrated right now that the Bush crime syndicate had the three ingredients that must be proven in an indictment accusing them of mass murder and high treason: method, motive and opportunity! The Bush gang had all three. Due to the heavily reinforced steel construction of the WTC –including Building 7 –it is clear: airplanes and fires did not cause the towers to crash! It is significant, I think, that ‘officialdom’ lied about the very presence of a core. The very first ‘official conspiracy’ was a documentary rolled out on PBS within weeks of the 911 attacks.
The 911 Commission claims that “the [WTC] core was hollow”. Look at the construction photo to the right! Does that look hollow to you. Bluntly: the 911 Commission report is a bald-face lie. The core is fully visible as the construction photo above shows, as the video, likewise, proves conclusively!
The official conspiracy theories would have us believe that soft-bodied aluminum airliners penetrated 9 feet of concrete and 4 rows of 4-ft-square steel girders.
We are expected to believe as well that soft-bodied aluminum airliners penetrated the steel outside girders and the two rounds of 47.4 ft wide steel that made up the inside core!
This bears repeating: what the 911 Commission Report would have you believe just did not happen! The 911 Commission expects us to believe that the ‘core’ didn’t even exist. The 911 Commission lied to you!
The problem with ‘pancaking’ –the first ‘official theory’ to bite the dust –was that it was based upon the lie that ‘the core was hollow’. Watch the following video, paying attention to the dense steel construction. I dare say, a 757 might have bounced off or gotten chewed to bits, shredding on the way ‘in’. In any case, the damage would have been slight! It would not have eventually brought about the collapse of any building in the WTC. The building would have survived relatively unscathed and, as we in fact have seen on countless videos, the fires –never hot enough to have melted steel –cooled considerably and withing seconds the fires were spent, black smoke bellowing from ‘content’. Unlike a ‘controlled demolition’, the dinky, spent fires would never have brought the towers to the ground.
#1 by Richard Warnick on August 19, 2008 - 8:46 am
Cliff– You must know that David Ray Griffin is a retired professor of philosophy of religion and theology. His 9/11 theories have all been thoroughly debunked.
#2 by bekkieann on August 19, 2008 - 9:27 am
But what of BYU physics professor Stephen Johnson? I read his paper on the subject and watched the videos. Very convincing. He didn’t offer answers, he only pointed out discrepancies and asked the obvious questions. He lost his job as a result (http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1,1249,650200587,00.html).
I think many people fear delving into this topic further because none of us wants to be accused of being a paranoid conspiracy theorist. Many good points have been made about the physical evidence that are yet unanswered. Johnson’s paper supports some of what Griffin is quoted as saying here.
#3 by Cliff Lyon on August 19, 2008 - 9:46 am
Richard,
David Ray Griffen, as far as I know, only pokes holes in the official story. What ‘theories’ were debunked?
#4 by rmwarnick on August 19, 2008 - 10:10 am
Cliff– I linked to Griffin’s Wikipedia article. The article hopefully answers your question. Basically, Griffin believes that the 9/11 attacks were a “false flag” operation by the U.S. government and his various theories are in support of this thesis.
There is no “official story” put out by the Bush administration, except for Condi Rice’s lame testimony that “no one could have anticipated” the attacks. Of course, Rice was memorably forced to admit the August 6, 2001 PDB contradicts her version of events.
#5 by rmwarnick on August 19, 2008 - 10:22 am
Might be a little OT for this post, but not much. This Thursday, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will release its draft WTC 7 investigation report.
#6 by Richard Warnick on August 19, 2008 - 11:08 am
Cliff– Just to illustrate the mendacity of the 9/11 CTs, look at the out-of-context quote from the 9/11 Commission report: “the [WTC] core was hollow.”
This claim is based on a footnote on page 541 of the report. The actual quote reads, in context:
In context, this footnote is simply reiterating commonplace information. The exterior walls of the Twin Towers were the primary load-bearing structures, the interior cores were not. The cores were “hollow” in the sense that they were full of elevator shafts and stairwells. What everybody knows.
#7 by Who is watching the watchers on August 19, 2008 - 11:54 am
The testimony, given to major news magazines in Germany, and read or heard by millions of Europeans, of former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Bulow is pretty telling. He ended his career as Germanys’ Minister of Technology. He is a no nonsense high powered person, that commanded the joint forces of the German Wehrmacht.
He refers to the official conspiracy theory as a “fairy tale”, though casts no direction as to who the culprits may be. He simply points out the obvious discrepancies and then relates experiences he had with American intelligence agencies, and leaves it at that. For him the related tale measured against his own great experience was pure nonsense.
It is largely why we have no support in Europe. The upper echelon in France and Germany know something(non specific) is entirely wrong with the scenario platted out in the official 911 story.
I will leave it to you to follow whatever is left on the web from his interviews. For me the point is moot, the building is down, and treason within government actively or via stupidity has been effected in actions since those fateful days.
Von Bulow has seen remotely operated commercial airliners run by analog radio frequency controllers. Technicians found them on Lufthansa boeings in ‘91, which sent Von Bulow on the hunt, and involved reverse engineering the systems, lies from boeing, the State dept. that threatened into international incident, until he, and his people were SHOWN, how “operation homerun” was meant to work. Follow it, would be interesting to see how much of it is left on the web.
The envelope is closing, we all have lived in a very free and opportunistic information short time window…that is about to close up . The elites cannot have this knowing thing happening. You must be spoon fed what you believe, never should you think independently.
#8 by Leo Brown on August 19, 2008 - 3:29 pm
I recommend these links
here and here
I highly doubt that Purdue University was part of any conspiracy to hide the cause of the collapse.
You can tear apart reports all you want, but there are two ways to reproduce the collapse. One is to rebuild the Towers and fly planes into them. The other is to use a simulation. Purdue did a state-of-the-art job on the latter.
#9 by Larry Bergan on August 20, 2008 - 12:39 pm
All I know is that David Ray Griffins worst arguments seem more credible then the, Bush approved, 911 commissions best arguments. I just can’t see three buildings going down in a free fall fashion like that. It’s impossible!
#10 by rmwarnick on August 20, 2008 - 1:45 pm
Larry– Given that Bush tried to stop the 9/11 Commission from being formed, in what way do you mean it was “Bush approved”?
#11 by Larry Bergan on August 20, 2008 - 3:06 pm
Lee Hamilton who was the Democratic head of the committee was no more a Democrat then the man in the moon. It’s true Bush did everything he could to stop an examination of the worst attack ever on American soil, but when that failed, he made sure that committee was as partisan as possible. There were actually two men who might have caused trouble, but for some reason, decided they didn’t want to be anywhere near that sham; Senators Max Cleland and Bob Graham.
#12 by Bob S. on August 21, 2008 - 2:01 pm
Another nail in the conspiracy theory
#13 by Who is watching the watchers on August 21, 2008 - 2:19 pm
The official story is a conspiracy theory, or in your caseBob, a conspiracy fact. The 19 men that hi-jacked planes and then over came the crew with box-cutters, then flying the planes into the towers and the Pentagon, that is the official conspiracy theory.
I guess we’ll just never know for sure, like so many events that are world changing. They all mean different things, to different people.
#14 by Larry Bergan on August 21, 2008 - 3:22 pm
Building number seven committed suicide! Case closed!