While we are having a conversation about whether Obama is secretly trying to overthrow the government, we are not having a conversation about how corrupt John McCain is…
BECAUSE WE ALREADY KNOW!
While we are having a conversation about whether Obama is secretly trying to overthrow the government, we are not having a conversation about how corrupt John McCain is…
BECAUSE WE ALREADY KNOW!
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 7th, 2008, 10:24 am and is filed under Corruption, John McCain. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Ken Bingham on October 7, 2008 - 11:10 am
This country has survived many Republican and Democrat administrations and even when Democrats have been in power I never feared for the country because even though Democrats and even some Republican Presidents have been bone headed I always knew they didn’t hate their country, but this election is different. We may be electing the first person ever who does not have the best interest of this country at heart. Barack Obama has associated himself his entire adult life with people who hate this country and would love to see if fall. I believe along with many others that Obama shares the views of those he has surrounded himself with. If Obama wins I know one thing for certain this country will never be the same, and not for the better, and may even cease to exist. Which many of Obama’s friends would love to see and could possibly be his ultimate goal.
#2 by Richard Warnick on October 7, 2008 - 11:31 am
Ken- Wow, just wow. If you truly believe what you said, then you ought to wonder why President Bush doesn’t use his self-granted emergency powers to cancel the election.
As Americans, we don’t want to see our country fail. We didn’t even want to see President Bush fail, particularly after the 9/11 attacks. We rallied around him, made him (briefly) the most popular President ever. Despite the best we could do, America did fail– spectacularly. Barack Obama is our only hope right now to start the long process of rebuilding what Bush destroyed.
It may be a false hope, but it’s all we’ve got left.
#3 by Anonymous on October 7, 2008 - 11:48 am
“We may be electing the first person ever, who …” Actually, Ken we already did that. Sort of. In 2000 and again in 2004.
Try again.
#4 by JFarmer on October 7, 2008 - 12:15 pm
Ken:
You need to go to the hospital – psyc ward – for some medication.
#5 by Cliff Lyon on October 7, 2008 - 12:19 pm
Ken,
What makes you think that Americans who are disgusted by our Country just want ot kill it?
We want to make it better.
Can you understand that?
#6 by bekkieann on October 7, 2008 - 12:36 pm
Ken, I feel sorry for you that to have such fear. You repeat a lot of nonsense and don’t realize scheming people wrote it just to alarm people like you. I wonder what makes you so willing to embrace such radical ideas when reason and common sense would calm your fears.
#7 by Obi wan liberali on October 7, 2008 - 12:57 pm
Wow, paranoid histrionics coming from your kneck of the woods. Who’d a thunk it? Now where did I put my foil hat?
#8 by Ken Bingham on October 7, 2008 - 1:14 pm
This is funny coming from people who believe that the Bush Administration orchestrated 9/11. However, we have a person running for president who has virtually come out of nowhere, will not discuss his past and various relationships, and attacks anyone that asks perfectly legitimate questions. He downplays or denies his ties with radical groups and individuals. He will not say what he truly believes but instead talks about abstract concepts like “change” and other bumper sticker rhetoric. He has trouble answering questions on the spot because he has to guard his words as to not reveal what he truly believes. Can anyone in here honestly say that you know the real Barack Obama besides the one packaged by his handlers and the media? He is the biggest ? of any candidate I have ever seen in my lifetime.
#9 by Richard Warnick on October 7, 2008 - 1:19 pm
Ken, back on message 100 percent. Unanswered questions? Come on, Barack Obama has been under a microscope since he won the Iowa caucuses nine months ago.
#10 by Bob S. on October 7, 2008 - 1:27 pm
Bekkieann,
Sorry but I disagree with you about it being a bunch of nonsense and written to alarm.
Was William Ayers a terrorist or not…call him a “Viet Nam War Protester” or anything else, but did he and his group set off bomb? Did they damage property and try to bring about change in policy with that violence?
Did Reverend Wright talk about the destruction of the white people? If the white preacher of a white candidate had said the same things about the black race, would we even be talking about that candidate now?
Sorry, but read those people’s own words and tell me that others are writing nonsense.
Obama’s own words on the 2nd amendment, his own actions as a part of the Joyce foundation…aren’t made up by others. Here is a group of people who set out to influence the judicial branch by “buying” law review articles and did exactly that.
What other rights does Obama and his associates not like? What will he do to remove your freedom to exercise them?
#11 by JFarmer on October 7, 2008 - 1:45 pm
Bob:
I may be going out on a limb here, but let’s assume everything you say is true.
So freaking what? Compared to the disaster that W wrought upon this nation and McSame proposes to continue, just what is it with the Ayers and Wright connections that could be worse?
I understand your concerns re the 2nd Amend. so you need not respond on that point.
#12 by bekkieann on October 7, 2008 - 1:57 pm
Bob,
Asked and answered. We are all getting a bit repetitive.
My point is that the discussion of this decades-old history is merely a distraction — something McCain desperately needs right now. If we were to all agree that these are really not relevant issues and not worth bringing up, and both sides were to quit talking about them, McCain would be finished.
They are not relevant, but if one campaign insists on it, the other has no choice but to fight fire with fire.
The country is going to hell, the futures of our children and grandchildren are dark indeed, and we sit here and quibble.
#13 by Bob S. on October 7, 2008 - 2:03 pm
Albert/James/Whoever,
So would you feel comfortable electing a white man who believed the only way to save the white race was to destroy another?
If Obama attended that church for 20 years, there are a couple of premises we can review:
1. He doesn’t believe in God/Black Liberation Theology and was using membership in the church to get votes
2. He attended church and does believe in God, but not the theology preached there.
3. He believes in the Black Liberation Theology preached at that church
4. He attended the church, believes in God but was completely clueless as to the theology of the church.
If premise 1, he is a cynical self-serving politician and I don’t want to vote for him. If you don’t believe, stand up and say so. Don’t pretend.
If premise 2, he is a cynical self-serving politician and I don’t want to vote for him. I want someone willing to act on his beliefs. If he didn’t believe in that theology, he should have gone someplace where he can support.
If premise 3, I don’t agree with the values, principles and concepts as espoused by Black Liberation Theology and don’t want anyone in office who does. This would also go for those who believe the opposite is true, I don’t want them in office either.
If premise 4, he is completely clueless and is as bad or worse then what the liberals here say about Bush. I wouldn’t want to vote for anyone that Clueless. Do you?
Read what Ayers is advocating in his position as a professor of Education. Read what the Chicago Annenberg grant money did. I don’t want people advocating positions opposing mine to be elected.
Bush, for all his many faults, has not tried to hide his associations or agendas. Obama is, so the question is why?
I believe that he is trying to hide how extremely liberal he is, only to get into office.
I see Obama’s policy as continuing this country slide into socialism and even accelerating that slide.
#14 by Ken Bingham on October 7, 2008 - 2:11 pm
The first thing a President Osama will do is institute the “fairness” doctrine to destroy talk radio. Yes, they will all go to satalite, but I can see a Democrat Congress trying to regulate that too. They wont stop there, soon the internet will be regulated and speech restricted. Obama will nominate Justices to the supreme court that will make Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg look like Phyllis Schlafly that will uphold his curbs on free speech. He will make every appeals court in this country clones of the 9th Circuit Court, possibly even worse. He will make guns illegal. He will ration energy. He will entangle us into foreign treaties in the name of global warming and make us subject to the world court. He will nationalize major industries including Banking (at least complete the job), Health Care (He will institute new payroll taxes to fund it.) Oil (cut domestic supplies to practically zero), Airline (Travel will be on a need only basis and with government approval.), Automobile (Can we say YUGO), Energy (severely ration, unless of course you are a favored group, then you will be subsidized). Indoor temperature 85 degrees in Summer, will be the law of the land.
By the end of his 1st term (hopefully his last) human behavior will be severely restricted.
#15 by Obi wan liberali on October 7, 2008 - 2:12 pm
As for Rev. Wright, I remember well my church leaders speaking from the pulpit the racially repugnant idea that dark skin was a curse from God for the disbelief of their ancestors. My AP history teacher also taught in class that the holocaust of the Jews in Germany was exaggerated to instill zionist sympathies. Such a belief didn’t stop him from being called Bishop. I even had a former employee of mine who had an arsenal in his basement waiting for the black helicopters with the UN flag. A guy I played basketball with on a regular basis was shot dead after he and his buddies gang-raped the girlfriend of their drug dealer. Yeah, I’ve got some shady people I’ve dealt with. Some of these guys, I have fond feelings for, despite their beliefs or mistakes. But the paranoia that Obama is some Manchurian candidate is so implausible and off the wall, you really have to wonder about the mental stability of the individuals who hold them.
BTW Ken, me and my pals with the black helicopters ARE coming, but it won’t be UN flags, but Obama banners. Be afraid, be very afraid. Bwahahahaha!
Obi wan liberali
Trilateral Commission
Tooele Chapter
#16 by bekkieann on October 7, 2008 - 2:14 pm
And I have one more problem with this whole guilt-by-association strategy. One of the ugliest times in American history was in the 50’s when the House Committee on Un-American activities, led by Joe McCarthy, ruined the lives of many people simply by their association with (or refusal to deny association with) people accused of being communists. It illustrates how hatred and paranoid thought can make people go too far.
Let common sense return.
#17 by Bob S. on October 7, 2008 - 2:14 pm
Bekkieann,
What is decades old? Obama’s attending the Trinity United Church of Christ?
Doesn’t he still have membership there? When did Rev. Wright step down?
According to MSNBC, Wright didn’t step down from Obama’s campaign until March of this year….hardly decades old.
People question McCain’s judgment and vetting process regarding Palin, but consider Obama’s vetting process for an advisor on his “spiritual” committee.
By the way, why does Bush get pilloried by the left for believing but Obama doesn’t?
Obama and Ayers served together on a foundation 6 years ago…again not decades old
Don’t want to quible, let’s ask Richard to host another Point/Counterpoint. He was kind enough to do that previous. Maybe we an limit it to a single issue.
What issue would you like to discuss, my fellow BSer?
#18 by bekkieann on October 7, 2008 - 2:28 pm
You see, Bob? You just want to go on with the meaningless debate instead of debating the things that really matter in the long run.
Decades old refers to Ayers’ activites and the Keating Five.
As for vetting spiritual leaders, it’s hardly the same as the choice for vice president. And speaking of her, what do you think of her spiritual leader who casts out witchcraft?
I’m afraid I may not be here for the point/counterpoint if there is one. If I were to choose a topic it would be broadly on the economy with no discussion of Ayers, Wright, Keating, or other such.
(I’ll admit I’ve been a BSer in good standing for a long time.)
#19 by Bob S. on October 7, 2008 - 2:33 pm
Bekkieann,
I won’t condemn anyone for a believing if that faith doesn’t call for others to be hurt. If that faith calls for others to be hurt or put down I think it goes against what I believe to be Christianity.
I pointed out that while Ayer’s activities are decades old, sort of like the Keating 5 activities, Obama’s involvement isn’t.
Notice that I’m trying to focus not on what Ayer’s did in the past, but how it influences Obama now.
The economy is a very broad topic…any particular interests?
#20 by Don on October 7, 2008 - 2:45 pm
You know Ken, you’re an utter “moran”. (wink wink, doggonit, smirky smirk, you betcha!)
If you’re so concerned about Obama, why isn’t any of this nonsense posted over on your blog?
The truly scary thing is that there are people like you out there who really think the way you do. I know there are plenty of people who fake it for political purposes, but to actually believe the crap you believe (and unfortunately, you seem to be quite sincere) . . . it’s utterly insane.
#21 by Don on October 7, 2008 - 2:53 pm
Bob S.
What’s wrong with Ayers’ more recent activities? How do they influence Obama now? Is advocating for better inner city schools a bad thing? Republicans work with Ayers all the time these days.
#22 by bekkieann on October 7, 2008 - 2:56 pm
BS, you choose the topic. I do have a couple of specific interests. For example, the privitization of retirement programs, health care, etc. Also deregulation of financial institutions (60 Minutes had a very interesting story about “credit default swaps” that would be a big topic in itself).
As I tried to think of what topic to suggest, I realized how really mammoth the topic of the economy is, and it impressed me even more what a terrible waste of valuable time it is for candidates to talk about irrelevant issues.
#23 by JFarmer on October 7, 2008 - 3:46 pm
Bob S.:
I have been a Catholic for 50 years now, but I don’t practice everything taught by my church. In fact, I find repugnant some of the things taught by my church. So, I guess I’m still left to wonder just what is the point you are trying to make.
PS. Speaking of churches, we all know about some silly bullshit church up in Wasilla Alaska that teaches bizarre crap. Are you going to offer a lecture about that as well?
#24 by Ken on October 7, 2008 - 8:22 pm
Don
I can post quick responses on oneutah.org but posting on my blog takes too much time and when I really get into my blog everything else goes to pot and seeing I am in school I can’t afford too many other distractions.
Plus, I like driving you liberals crazy.
#25 by Don on October 7, 2008 - 10:05 pm
Oh yeah, I was wondering if you were still in school Ken . . . because you aren’t getting any smarter.
#26 by Cav, muddling towards some semblence of truthiness on October 8, 2008 - 10:27 am
Attempting to drive liberals crazy, he finds himself slipping over the edge!
#27 by Ken on October 8, 2008 - 10:34 am
My liberal education has failed to make me liberal.
#28 by Obi wan liberali on October 8, 2008 - 12:50 pm
Or educated. (sorry, I couldn’t resist)
#29 by Don on October 8, 2008 - 1:17 pm
Obi wan,
I was going to say the same thing, but I figured I’d let someone else do the piling on.
#30 by Annie get your gun on October 8, 2008 - 4:48 pm
Dear Ken and ilk,
Why don’t you just admit that you’re racist, my republican father can. I lovingly remind him that Barak Obama is half white. His response, “I suppose he is”.
BTW, he can’t stand McCain either and says he refuses to vote this year.
Oh and your quote:
“we have a person running for president who has virtually come out of nowhere, will not discuss his past and various relationships, and attacks anyone that asks perfectly legitimate questions. He downplays or denies his ties with radical groups and individuals. He will not say what he truly believes but instead talks about abstract concepts like “change” and other bumper sticker rhetoric. He has trouble answering questions on the spot because he has to guard his words as to not reveal what he truly believes. Can anyone in here honestly say that you know the real Barack Obama besides the one packaged by his handlers and the media? He is the biggest ? of any candidate I have ever seen in my lifetime”. Aren’t you talking about Sarah Palin here? If the f-me pump fits…
#31 by Cliff Lyon on October 8, 2008 - 5:14 pm
Ken,
What liberal education? Are you saying Davis County public schools are liberal? Or are you trying say all education is liberal?
Perhaps you mean educated people are more liberal?
Hmmm why would that be?