Dignity
If you read only one article this week, read this one:
Suddenly, the doctor was at the door to my mother’s room again. He waved me out into the hall. He needed a medical directive. Immediately. Her vital signs were tanking. If we were going to put a tube in her, and put her on machines that could breathe for her, it had to be now. Right now. So it fell to me to walk back into my mother’s room, tell her she was going to die, and lay out her rather limited options. She could be put under and put on machines and live for a day or two in a coma, long enough for her other two children to get down to Tucson and say their good-byes, which she wouldn’t be able to hear. Or she could live for maybe another six hours if she continued to wear an oxygen mask that forced air into her lungs with so much force it made her whole body convulse. Or she could take the mask off and suffocate to death. Slowly, painfully, over an hour or two.
It was her choice.
“No mask,” she said, “no pain.”
Her nurse promised to give her enough morphine to deaden any pain she might feel after my mother made her choice: She would take off the mask. She would go now. I told the doctor and then ran sobbing—no longer trying to hold it together—into the waiting room to get my stepfather, my sister, and my aunt. Things were worse than they were five minutes ago. Get in here, I said, get in here now.
We said our good-byes—doesn’t that sound dignified? But her mask was still on and her body still convulsing. Good-byes reduced my affable stepfather to wracking sobs; good-byes sent me and my sister falling to the floor beside our mother’s deathbed. We held a phone up to my mother’s ear so she could hear one of my brothers shout his good-bye over the whir and thump of the oxygen machine, while we tried desperately to get my other brother on the phone . . . [Snip}
Then my mother was ready. The mask came off, she held tight to our hands, and the morphine went in. Her grip slackened. My mother was still alive, in there somewhere, beyond our reach. Was she in pain? We don’t know. She couldn’t talk to us now, or focus on us, but she was awake, her eyes open. She gasped for breath, again and again, and we sat there, traumatized, waiting for her heart to stop, waiting for the very first sound that I had ever heard—my mother’s heart beating—to go silent.
People must accept death at “the hour chosen by God,” according to Pope Benedict XVI, leader of the Catholic Church, which is pouring money into the campaign against I-1000.
The hour chosen by God? What does that even mean? Without the intervention of man—and medical science—my mother would have died years earlier. And at the end, even without assisted suicide as an option, my mother had to make her choices. Two hours with the mask off? Six with the mask on? Another two days hooked up to machines? Once things were hopeless, she chose the quickest, if not the easiest, exit. Mask off, two hours. That was my mother’s choice, not God’s.
Did my mother commit suicide? I wonder what the pope might say.
I know what my mother would say: The same church leaders who can’t manage to keep priests from raping children aren’t entitled to micromanage the final moments of our lives.
If religious people believe assisted suicide is wrong, they have a right to say so. Same for gay marriage and abortion. They oppose them for religious reasons, but it’s somehow not enough for them to deny those things to themselves. They have to rush into your intimate life and deny them to you, too—deny you control over your own reproductive organs, deny you the spouse of your choosing, condemn you to pain (or the terror of it) at the end of your life.
The proper response to religious opposition to choice or love or death can be reduced to a series of bumper stickers: Don’t approve of abortion? Don’t have one. Don’t approve of gay marriage? Don’t have one. Don’t approve of physician-assisted suicide? For Christ’s sake, don’t have one. But don’t tell me I can’t have one—each one—because it offends your God.
Fuck your God.
At it’s core, it’s about choice isn’t it and the Religious Right wants to make our choices for us.
Glenden Brown




October 10th, 2008 at 11:00 am
” . . . it’s somehow not enough for them to deny those things to themselves. They have to rush into your intimate life and deny them to you, too . . . ”
Uh-huh, been trying to get this point across to the religiously narrow-minded for years. The problem of course is that the Christian persecution complex prevents any “widening” of the mind.
October 10th, 2008 at 11:30 am
I should add that the “persecution complex” is not exclusive to Christians. My intolerance for the religiously intolerant knows no bounds.
October 10th, 2008 at 11:31 am
Glendon, that story reminds me very much of my own father’s story. He wasn’t conscious, so I had to make that decision, and it was the most agonizing decision I’ve ever made. I hope I never have to again. Oddly enough, though I’m Catholic now, I was agnostic back then, and I felt the need for the first time in years, for some spiritual advice from someone…anyone…to tell me I was doing the right thing. I didn’t get it then, other than a brief prayer by someone I’d met in the hospital.
The Catholic Church doesn’t have a clear position on an issue like this, though there are some within the Church who are rather loud, and would like their position to be “it”. That said, you are right, that this is an issue that the church should have no involvement in, when it comes to legality. Their role is not to legislate, nor should it ever be. There’s a very good, very clear reason for separation of Church and State.
I’m going to go read the whole thing, now. I’m already crying, so I might as well get the rest of the story, right?