I actually thought about blogging this before someone else did. Glenn Greenwald beat me to it. The best film of 1985. and one of my favorites, is “Brazil,” Terry Gilliam’s mind-blowing, darkly comedic take on life in the late 20th Century. In the phrase made famous by the Bush administration, no one could have anticipated that Gilliam’s satire would become reality just 16 years later. In retrospect, I now see this is Terry Gilliam’s world, and we just live in it. It’s a place where freedom has been forfeited for a false promise of protection from terrorist attacks.

Terry Gilliam: Have people forgotten I made Brazil? George W. [Bush], [Dick] Cheney, and company haven’t. I’m thinking of suing them for the illegal and unauthorized remake of Brazil.
The film’s story takes place not in any particular country, but in a British-inflected dystopia that combines familiar elements of George Orwell’s 1984 with Marx Brothers-style insanity. The protagonist is Sam Lowry (Jonathan Pryce), a mid-level bureaucrat in the Ministry of Information who, like all bureaucrats, wants nothing more than to keep a low profile and escape responsibility for the societal chaos which the government is inadvertently causing, with the best of intentions and the worst heavy-handed methods. The actual plot often takes a back seat the the inspired writing (by Charles McKeown, Tom Stoppard, and Terry Gilliam), acting and art direction as we explore Sam Lowry’s strange world. Which bears disturbing similarities to our own, such as:
- Rampant consumerism, and the elevation of meaningless considerations of status and vanity over personal happiness and well-being.
- There is an open-ended war on terror (in its 13th year in the film) in which the sheer ineptitude and brutality of the government appears to be the main reason for the ongoing violence.
- Government surveillance is widespread, but incompetently managed.
- People are being arrested by mistake and secretly tortured, sometimes to death, because the official paperwork says they are terrorists.
(I’m usually turned off by torture, but in “Brazil” it’s not explicit– and Michael Palin(!) brilliantly plays Jack, the friendly government torturer) - Euphemisms dominate public policy. Torture is conducted by an organization known as “Information Retrieval.” A dead man appears in the official records as “dormanted.”
- Security is promoted as the highest value. Posters urge citizens to “Be Safe: Be Suspicious” and “Don’t suspect a friend, report him.”

Hapless bureaucrat Sam Lowry (Jonathan Pryce) awaits torture. “Don’t fight it son! Confess quickly, or you’ll jeopardize your credit rating,” the guard tells him.
“Brazil” offers one ray of hope, in the form of Archibald ‘Harry’ Tuttle (Robert DeNiro) with a great catch phrase: “Listen, kid, we’re all in it together.” He’s the last free man, the last one who cares and has compassion, and he’s smart enough to run circles around the overextended bureaucracy. Everyone else seems helpless.
Getting back to the here and now, today Glenn Greenwald offers a long post on the Obama administration’s 180-degree reversal on the abuse of the state secrets privilege. In a nutshell, Obama’s Justice Department is continuing the Bush administration’s unprecedented policy. Which says that if the government breaks the law in secret, the courts can’t do anything about it because that would reveal the secret! We’re living in Terry Gilliam’s world– and we’re all in it together.



#1 by Tim Carter - February 10th, 2009 at 20:11
Yeah, I was really surprized that film didn’t make a bigger comeback in the last 5 years. My other favorite is ‘They Live’. Different parallels, kind of… And who will ever forget South Parks’ ‘Cripple Fight”?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsfe885tKsw&feature=related
#2 by jdberger - February 11th, 2009 at 01:19
I prefer 12 Monkeys, but I’m a Brad Pitt fan.
Contrast it’s portrayal of the “extreme enviromentalist” who decides that to save the world he has to destroy it with the gov’t in Brazil which does the same to liberty – both with the best of intentions.
Of course – there were quite a number of us who warned that Mr. Hopey-Changey was just making wild irresponsible statements on the campaign trail. We predicted that as soon as he was faced with the harsh reality of finally being responsible for his decisions (not his 1% vote) that he’d change his tune.
And that, Sir, is why many of us (obviously not all) were willing to give him a chance.
Anyway – regarding rendition – the President is only following the rules of the previous 2 Presidents.
#3 by cav - February 11th, 2009 at 08:28
Another good one was “Lost in America”. where Albert Brooks and his bride, just wanted their money back.
Ah…good times.
#4 by Richard Warnick - February 11th, 2009 at 09:04
jd–
I liked “12 Monkeys” too, but I’m more of a Bruce Willis fan (although Brad Pitt did a great job in “Troy”).
You probably didn’t see Rachel Maddow’s show last night, I think I’ll post the clip.
#5 by jdberger - February 11th, 2009 at 13:06
I don’t listen to the firebreathers (on either side). They help things, they just move the goal-posts.
Though, I do enjoy Ann Coulter’s humor. It’s my guilty pleasure.
#6 by Richard Warnick - February 11th, 2009 at 13:22
Are you comparing Rachel Maddow to Ann Coulter? Clearly you don’t watch Maddow’s show.
#7 by Larry Bergan - February 11th, 2009 at 14:10
Cav:
I’ve never seen Brazil, but I’m glad to see somebody else liked “Lost in America.” There were some truly funny scenes in that movie. I also liked Albert’s “Explaining Your Life.”
#8 by cav - February 11th, 2009 at 14:37
Larry, you’ld like Brazil, and 12 Monkeys. Both really good movies. As was practically everything Albert Brooks ever did. If dry is your thing. It is mine.
#9 by Becky - February 11th, 2009 at 15:02
jd, you enjoy Ann Coulter’s ‘humor’? I don’t think I’d call it humor. For some real humor, read my fave Helen reviewing Ann’s latest book chapter by chapter.
#10 by Richard Warnick - February 11th, 2009 at 15:35
Coulter is being investigated for voter fraud– again. This time in Connecticut.
Downside: if they send her to jail, she’ll just write another book. And go on TV again to say stupid stuff.
#11 by Larry Bergan - February 11th, 2009 at 15:55
Apparently, Joe The Plumber and Ann The Lawyer are here to stay despite the lunacy of it all. Being convicted of a felony against his country did nothing to prevent Gordon Liddy from having a radio forum lasting, possibly, decades.
You gotta love the MSM!
#12 by jdberger - February 11th, 2009 at 18:00
Yes – I like Coulter’s humor.
No, I didn’t compare her to Maddow – though I did lump her in the same bucket.
#13 by Larry Bergan - February 12th, 2009 at 00:32
Ann Coulter is putrid! I can’t think of another woman on earth I would say that about.
Maddow is foxy and smart!
#14 by Cliff - February 12th, 2009 at 09:04
Good job JDBerger,
Lump the worlds biggest neo-con whore with Godess Maddow.
Is it any wonder you have no credibility?
#15 by Moribund Republic - February 12th, 2009 at 10:13
Entertainers both, and polarizing and unbalanced as well.
More of the dialectic at work. Keep believing it. Keep fighting and quarreling and watch where the money goes.
#16 by jdberger - February 12th, 2009 at 11:13
Cliffy – I lump you in the same bucket, also.
How’s that anger management thing coming?
#17 by Dwight Sheldon Adams - February 12th, 2009 at 11:35
MR is right on this one. Entertainers don’t inform. The more emotional our attachment to our differences is, the more polarized we become, and on more axes. Entertainment creates such attachments.
#18 by Richard Warnick - February 12th, 2009 at 13:25
MR/Dwight–
Rachel Maddow is a journalist, one of the few we have on cable news. Not an entertainer. Have you ever watched her show or listened to her on the radio?
#19 by Moribund Republic - February 12th, 2009 at 13:46
Anyone on TV for the purpose of opinion piece journalism is an entertainer.
I have listened, she gives those with that ear a place in the news entertainment schedule.
Remember, the 2nd job. The goal is a diametrically opposed populace, the extremists do the their jobs, and in the conflict the corporate/government elite grows itself on the backs of the people.
Rachel and Ann retire to healthy paychecks and retirements for their crucial role in the grand Oz like illusion.
#20 by Ken Schreiner - February 12th, 2009 at 17:50
Nice job analyzing “Brazil” which, I agree, was probably not only the best film of 1985 but of the entire decade with the possible exception of “Gandhi” or “Repo Man.” You even covered the “Room 101″ aspects of the Bush Regime. I know- that’s “1984.” But then again, so was “Brazil”- just with broad physical comedy. Perhaps coincidentally, I caught “1984″ the other night and forgot how good that was as well. It just wasn’t as funny. Well, not funny at all. Unless you’re a Republican.
#21 by jdberger - February 13th, 2009 at 00:00
Ken,
You do realize that Orwell was a fervent anti-communist. He saw the elephant.
He wasn’t talking about Bush or fascists for that matter. He was discussing Stalin and Communism.
Of course, the joy of great literature is that it convinces the reader that the author is speaking directly to him.
#22 by Larry Bergan - February 13th, 2009 at 01:03
Ken S:
Good to see your name here again! Your comments were some of the best on the blog. Now I know I have to see this movie.
#23 by schreinervideo - February 13th, 2009 at 08:12
Hey,Larry! Good to be back. Business has kept me busy (redundant in a literal, sort of English major way). Sadly, the Bush Regime’s greatest gift to America- bankruptcy- has ground the economy to a hard stop so I find myself with more time to read blogs. If this is what’s happening around the world, we are in real trouble, my friend.
To jdberger: To quote another immortal movie star, “Eeeeeyaaahhh, sort of ironic- ain’t it, Doc?” The Bush-Cheney Goof Squad even had “Newspeak” down, as evidenced by Karl Rove’s latest op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. 2+2=5 anyone?
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2009/02/axelrod_on_bush_advisers_butt.html?hpid=topnews
#24 by Richard Warnick - February 13th, 2009 at 08:37
Ken–
I check out your excellent blog about once a week, but I apologize for not leaving comments. I’m supposed to be working, and there are right-wing lies to refute every day on the other blogs.