The Minnesota Supreme Court has rejected Norm Coleman’s challenge to the election results and has ordered that Al Franken may be seated as U.S. Senator from Minnesota.
Congratulations to Al. It’s been a long time coming and many months overdue.

The Minnesota Supreme Court has rejected Norm Coleman’s challenge to the election results and has ordered that Al Franken may be seated as U.S. Senator from Minnesota.
Congratulations to Al. It’s been a long time coming and many months overdue.
Al Franken, Minnesota, senator
This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 30th, 2009, 12:01 pm and is filed under 2008 Election, Democrats. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Larry Bergan - June 30th, 2009 at 12:47
A democrat finally stood up for himself!
Don’t let the door hit ya, Norm!
#2 by James Farmer - June 30th, 2009 at 12:57
A copy of the decision.
The GOP must be beside itself right about now, trying to figure out the next best delay tactic. Colman is nothing but a tool for the GOP at this point.
PS. For those with strong stomachs, tune in to Hannity on KSL and listen to his thoughts re the subject: absolutely priceless!
#3 by cav - June 30th, 2009 at 13:25
Norm Coleman…somewhat shy of being, well darn it…just not good enough.
Now take a hike Shyte-stain.
#4 by James Farmer - June 30th, 2009 at 13:36
Coleman concedes to Franken. Now he can focus on the FBI’s investigation into his ties to businessman Nasser Kazeminy.
#5 by Ken - June 30th, 2009 at 13:52
Stolen election in Iran and Minnesota. Stewart Smalley is going to become a major embarrassment for the state. The only silver lining is he will provide a lot of comedy relief.
#6 by cav - June 30th, 2009 at 14:27
The ghost of Paul Wellstone scoffs in your general direction.
What could possibly be more laughable than the republican obstructionists, whose mock patriotism is born of a possible loss of arms-sale revenue?
Ken you are pathetic and your photoshopping should be reserved for the malls.
#7 by reader - June 30th, 2009 at 15:24
As someone who used to listen to Franken on Air America, I predict Sen Franken will have the intellect of Chuck Schumer, the ethics of Barney Frank and the longevity of Jimmy Carter.
#8 by Ken - June 30th, 2009 at 16:42
You don’t seem to mind stolen elections when your guy is the beneficiary. All the crying and moaning over the 2000 and 2004 elections now seem mighty hypocritical.
#9 by cav - July 1st, 2009 at 06:15
In all three cases it really has more to do with who got the most votes. Not court rulings, not war-zone politics, not the wishes of those who would stall the corrections that are so sorely needed.
#10 by James Farmer - July 1st, 2009 at 09:38
Ken:
Are you just stirring the pot to see who bites, or is there something of substance in your comment?
Comparing the shenanigans and machinations behind the stolen 2000 and 2004 elections to the steady and methodical steps taken to resolve the Minnesota election is comparing apples to oranges.
It is time for you to recognize the damage done to America by the Bush administration and the fact that the stupid and susceptible among us has reduced in number, at least for the time being. You might consider making the switch, too.
#11 by Larry Bergan - July 1st, 2009 at 09:48
Actually, I’m stunned that the Republicans are stopping here, it is very unlike them not to win at any cost to their dignity, humanity, or sense of fairness. Maybe Norm didn’t like waking up every day feeling like he had just crawled out of the swamp.
#12 by James Farmer - July 1st, 2009 at 09:52
Or maybe Norm is feeling the pinch of the FBI investigation and starting to crack under the pressure.
#13 by cav - July 1st, 2009 at 12:35
Franken graduated from Harvard – cum laude with a degree in political science.
#14 by jdberger - July 1st, 2009 at 16:51
Really now, James?
How so?
#15 by James Farmer - July 1st, 2009 at 16:57
Geeze, jd, hasn’t cliff told you before not to walk around politics with your eyes wide shut? It really is apples and oranges, and with a little thought and retrospect, you will realize why. Give it a try, I know you can do it.
#16 by reader - July 1st, 2009 at 17:40
Bush graduated from Yale and Harvard….so what’s your point?
#17 by Larry Bergan - July 1st, 2009 at 19:30
Oh, I thought of one more reason why Coleman through in the towel. When the federal supreme court stole the election from Gore in 2000, they ruled that no other such case could be brought before them.
Remember that ridiculous ruling, Bushies? They ruled that only one election could be stolen after THEY overturned states rights.
#18 by Richard Warnick - July 1st, 2009 at 19:52
Actually, I believe the SCOTUS majority opinion simply exempted Bush v. Gore from creating a precedent– which really flagged it as a one-off exercise in election tampering, instead of a standard ruling. Not the same thing as saying they would take up another such case.
However, it’s been said that any federal lawsuit on Coleman’s behalf would be very, very weak after a unanimous state supreme court decision.
#19 by Larry Bergan - July 1st, 2009 at 23:18
I’m just glad it’s over and the right guy won. I liked his books because they were entertaining while discussing very dark issues in a gutsy way. If only Harry Reid had the same gumption.
#20 by Larry Bergan - July 2nd, 2009 at 02:43
I don’t know Richard, sounds like legalese for no more stolen elections to me.
#21 by Richard Warnick - July 2nd, 2009 at 06:45
I thought the Republican justices said that so that nothing in the Bush v. Gore decision could be used against the GOP in future.
#22 by cav - July 2nd, 2009 at 06:56
I suspect there’s a difference between Cum Laude and the gifting of degrees to sons of the powerful and rich for C- work and cheerleading.
But that’s just me.
#23 by cav - July 2nd, 2009 at 08:07
I’d also like to thank the Harvard AND Yale graduate and his supporters for the Trillion-plus $ unjustified, and some would argue -illegal war and occupation. The impacts on our planet and the economy are a gift that won’t stop giving.
#24 by Becky Stauffer - July 2nd, 2009 at 08:19
I’ll join you in that, Cav.
#25 by James Farmer - July 2nd, 2009 at 08:33
Hmmm. You forgot to add the novel ways of interpreting the Constitution and treaties with foreign governments.
#26 by jdberger - July 2nd, 2009 at 10:30
Fabulous the way you dance around the question.
Do you ever give a direct answer, James?
#27 by jdberger - July 2nd, 2009 at 10:33
Are you suggesting that a “C” isn’t a passing grade, Cav?
#28 by James Farmer - July 2nd, 2009 at 10:38
jd:
Having both attended and taught undergraduates at such universities, I can assure you from personal experience that C and C- level work is considered near, if not actually, failing. it is a gift grade that, among other things, allows the tuition money, especially from legacy students, to keep flowing. You are well advised, yet again, to stop making excuses for George W. Bush.
#29 by Becky Stauffer - July 2nd, 2009 at 11:16
The question I can’t answer is why did America settle TWICE for a C- president? A barely passing president? Let’s all agree right here and now: Never again!
#30 by James Farmer - July 2nd, 2009 at 11:34
Becky:
Aside from the general “stupid and susceptible” tendencies of the nation’s populace as pointed out by Norman Mailer circa 2004, I add the following dity from the Vanity fair article: “It Came From Wasilla.”
These are certainly thought provoking questions – applicable to Bush just as much to Palin – that should keep folks like Ken Bingham awake at night, wondering just how they could have fallen into the same mindset – stupid and susceptible!
#31 by Becky Stauffer - July 2nd, 2009 at 12:36
I am still amazed to think of it. The “stupid and susceptible” explains why so much of the public embraced her, but I think the Palin selection by politically-savvy party bosses showed both a great disdain for the American people and a huge cynicism about what it takes to run our country. They acted as if

a monkeyanybody could be president. Come to think of it . . .#32 by cav - July 2nd, 2009 at 13:47
If I can’t dance, I want no part in it.
Gift grade or passing, I do not look up to such a low-set bar. Usually, I simply hop over it.
Somewhere along the way, I fell into the trap of envisioning ‘best and brightest’, not – He, whose father had connections.
#33 by Larry Bergan - July 2nd, 2009 at 13:52
Me also.
#34 by jdberger - July 2nd, 2009 at 14:02
So – I take it that none of you folks voted for John Kerry…
To answer “why select Palin” – because she excites the “base”. Much in the way that a “thoughtful, concerned*, aloof, partial-minority, lefty professor” excited the Dem Base.
Of course, given many of his policy decisions, it’s becoming pretty clear that they were “stupid and susceptible” too. I think that the story of Cliff’s neice illustrates that very well.
*
“Obama Breaks Silence on Gaza, Voices ‘Deep Concern’ Over Civilian Deaths”–headline, Ha’aretz, Jan. 7
“Obama Voices Concern About Freed Guantanamo Inmates”–headline, Reuters, Feb. 2
“Obama Voices Concern About Pakistan”–headline, New York Times, April 30
“Obama Expresses Concern for Tissainayagam”–headline, TamilNet.com, May 2
“Obama: Long-Term Joblessness a Concern”–headline, CNN.com, May 20
“Obama Says North Korea Nuclear Test a ‘Grave Concern’ “–headline, Reuters, May 25
“Obama to ‘Voice Concerns’ in Egypt Speech”–headline, Hill, May 29
“Obama Concerned at Sentence of Journalists in NKorea”–headline, Agence France-Presse, June 8
“Obama Names Video Games as Health Concern in Speech to A.M.A.”–headline, GamePolitics.com, June 15
“Obama Has ‘Deep Concerns’ About Iran’s Election”–headline, Newsweek Web site, June 16
“Obama Concern About Oil Speculation Unchanged-W.House”–headline, Reuters, June 18
“Obama Expresses Deep Concern Over Honduras Coup”–headline, Deutsche Presse Agentur, June 28
#35 by cav - July 2nd, 2009 at 14:14
I’m sorry Obama’s attempts to fixed all the things the republicans destroyed is going so slowly. I know a true genius
(cough) McCain (cough)
would have made short work of it by yesterday or possibly January 21st.
#36 by James Farmer - July 2nd, 2009 at 14:17
jd:
You make yourself look like an idiot when you compare Palin favorably to either Obama or John Kerry. We all know that you will retire to your grave making excuses for GWB. But Palin, too? Please, stop, just stop!
#37 by jdberger - July 2nd, 2009 at 15:02
James,
You you make yourself look like an idiot when you follow your obligatory ad hominem with a unthinking, generalized and hyperbolic statement.
I know that you are capable of so much more. Why debase yourself?
#38 by James Farmer - July 2nd, 2009 at 15:58
jd:
As I requested previously: stop, just stop. The barrel laughs from deep within are starting to hurt!
Gosh, who da thunk you’d actually start making excuses for Palin. Wasn’t it hard enough doing the same just for GWB?
#39 by jdberger - July 6th, 2009 at 12:57
Still nothing of substance, James.
Fluff, smoke and idle banter.
I’m sure that you can come up with something concrete, can’t you?
#40 by James Farmer - July 6th, 2009 at 13:30
jd:
As they say: “sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.”
#41 by brewski - July 6th, 2009 at 20:22
This is more evidence of your ethics. Whatever non-substantial slandering is just part of the sport. So Senator Al Franken should be treated the same was as a hypothetical Senator Rush Limbaugh?
Your words goose.
#42 by James Farmer - July 6th, 2009 at 20:31
huh??