Time magazine called the past decade the “Decade from Hell.”
A new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll finds that 58 percent of Americans agree President Bush’s tenure from 2001-2009 was either “awful” or “not so good,” while 29% said it was fair, and just 12% said it was either “good” or “great.”
Asked what they thought had the greatest negative impact on America this past decade, 38% cited the 9/11 terrorist attacks, 23% picked the mortgage and housing crisis, 20% said the Iraq war, 11% chose the stock market crash, and 6% said Hurricane Katrina.
But 37% said we lost ground on the environment, 46% said we lost ground on health and well being, 50% said we lost ground on peace and national security, 54% said we lost ground on the nation’s sense of unity, 55% said we lost ground in treating others with respect, 66% said we lost ground on moral values, and a whopping 74% said we lost ground on economic prosperity.

The pollsters didn’t ask me, but I could have told them that President Bush failed to stop the worst terrorist attack in history, took the nation into two unwinnable wars, shredded the Constitution, and crashed the economy– sending us into the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Bush was the first American president since Herbert Hoover to experience a net loss of jobs. Any one of those things would have landed him in the history books as a really bad president. In combination… WORST PRESIDENT EVER.
h/t: Think Progress.



#1 by Ed Firmage on December 21, 2009 - 6:16 pm
I think there is no American president who comes anywhere near Bush the Less in utter indifference, the attention span of a snail darter, with no inclination to read or to write or to think, utterly venal. Darts thrown at any page of any community’s telephone book would have found us a better president. We will still be suffering from these evil, stupid, and unconstitutional wars for at least a century. Probably very much longer. The rip-tides, the waves, the holocausts that will yet inevitably follow will make our angst, bewilderment and just sheer terror of the present seem like a pale prologue when we experience the karmic horror to come. We can do little, now, to limit or prevent all this. In the play, Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead, based on Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the two dull and stupid men who set in motion the horrific final scene of death of Hamlet, Laertes, Hamlet’s mother, the Queen, the King, and others, are in a small boat, headed for England and, they think, safety. They bear a sealed note, giving them safe conduct, they think. Actually, the note directs that they be immediately killed. One of these two look-a-like’s to Bush the Stupid, turns to the other, and says, “there must have been a time, somewhere in the beginning, when we could have said “No!.” The essence of Shakespearian tragedy, or for that matter the Greeks, is just so. We reach a point where we no longer have the capacity to turn back, to turn around, to repent. These wars that we let this madman lead us into have long since pushed us past the time when we could have said, “No!” Ed Firmage
#2 by Uncle Rico on December 21, 2009 - 6:55 pm
Ah, the nostalgia of the Bush years. This was one of my faves from that era. Man, I kinda miss that moron.
#3 by brewski on December 21, 2009 - 8:06 pm
Richard, all of these events are emperically true.
But also just as emperically true are the following:
The 9/11 terrorists entered and trained in the US when Clinton was president.
Prior to 9/11 was the first WTC bombing, the USS Cole, Riyadh, etc.
The asset bubble started in 1995.
Obama voted for warrantless wiretaps.
The stock market first cratered in March of 2000 thus starting the recession which followed, when Bush took office in Jaunary of 2001.
The Enron fraud ocurred under Clinton’s watch and was caught and prosecuted under Bush.
Barney Frank said he wanted to “roll the dice” with how Freddie and Fannie are managed.
Kerry, Clinton, Edwards etc all voted for Iraq.
No doubt a lot of crap has happened in the last 10 years or so. No doubt Bush missed a lot. But also no doubt there is a lot of blame to spread around including Bush, Clinton, Greenspan, Congress of both parties, Bernanke, Summers, Geithner, etc.
Any other attribution is Kool Aid drinking.
#4 by Richard Warnick on December 21, 2009 - 8:21 pm
brewski–
So your argument is stuff happens, and Bush just had the misfortune of being in the White House when these coincidences occurred. Good luck with that.
#5 by Bill W. on December 21, 2009 - 9:40 pm
It has been almost a year and you are still whining? You are a broken record. Let’s focus on the current administration. Things like insulting the mentally handicapped or misspelling a word that would have run Dan Quayle out of town on a rail. Or how about calling 1 republican vote a bi partisan effort among both parties? If you are loving the show thus far you are a crazed lunatic and should be locked away in a padded cell. You and everyone who thinks like you are voting for the downfall of our society because you think there are rich dupes out there not paying any taxes while you should the entire burden for the US. Bush did a better job than Obama has done thus far and he is looking to do worse by his own reports. If you see this as false please let me know why you think so. The health care reform just added another half trillion in earmarks and pork to get it past the Senate. We will be paying upwards of 3 trillion or more for this plan. Believe me it won’t be worth a dime.
#6 by brewski on December 21, 2009 - 10:42 pm
No Richard, that is not my argument. My argument is that the same bitter tirade you make on a weekly basis can and should be aimed at a wider cast of fools.
So your argument is that it is all Bush’s fault. Good luck with that.
#7 by Richard Warnick on December 22, 2009 - 7:52 am
Bill–
I am very critical of the Obama administration– check some of my recent posts. However, unlike some Republicans, I can clearly recall the last decade –when our country was misled into the multiple crises President Obama is now responsible for finding a way out of.
brewski–
When things go well, the president and his party take credit. When their policies bring about catastrophe, they get the blame. That’s the deal.
#8 by James Farmer on December 22, 2009 - 8:56 am
Bill W: How on earth can you say something like this with a straight face? This ranks with the most stupid, uninformed comments ever posted at 1U. I suggest you return to your friends at Redstate or KSL.com before your freepish head explodes from the education you will receive here!!!
#9 by brewski on December 22, 2009 - 10:56 am
I thought the deal was that when things go really badly (healthcare bill) they point the finger at someone else and dodge any responsibility.
Bill Clinton presided over several catastrophes and has consistently deflected responsibility.
The asset bubble started under his watch (1994, go back and look at the charts, http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images/2009/Feb/pe-ratio_image003.gif)
The stock market crash of 2000 was under his watch.
A recession immedately followed this crash.
The Cole, WTC #1 and Riyadh happened under Clinton’s watch.
So where is the blame, where is the accountability and where is your rage for Clinton?
#10 by James Farmer on December 22, 2009 - 11:13 am
Bill Clinton left office with an approval rating higher than any president in the past 50+ years. You, brew, are confusing the actions of Clinton – wise, thoughtful and counseled – with the knee-jerk reactions of a moron cowboy named George Bush. There is absolutely no comparison between the two!
#11 by Uncle Rico on December 22, 2009 - 11:32 am
And Bubba got a hummer in the Oval Office from a plump intern too! How could you forget that brew?
#12 by brewski on December 22, 2009 - 1:11 pm
James,
Tell me on my list which one was factually wrong.
Approval rating? Give me a break. GWB had far higher approval ratings now than BHO does. That is proof of absolutely nothing. Very weak reply James. Step up.
#13 by cav on December 22, 2009 - 1:12 pm
When Bill Clinton left office with those high approvals, the catastrophe that followed him was apparent to only a few lefties, (and, of course, the PNAC).
He was President the whole time the ’supreme’ court was deliberating bush v. Gore, and could have been more of a player in that crapticle.
Who knew the dem vp pick would have become such a republican?
#14 by brewski on December 22, 2009 - 1:21 pm
Rico, while the hummer in the oval office demonstrated Clinton’s decisionmaking, judgment, character and morals, it was not, in itself a catastrophe for the country. Later on his committing perjury to a grand jury and attempts to claim executive privilege did threaten the office of the president, but even that does not compare to his catastrophe of turning down the offer to take OBL.
#15 by Richard Warnick on December 22, 2009 - 1:28 pm
I’ve always put it like this: President Clinton brought dishonor on the Office of the President, and President Bush dishonored the United States of America before the entire world.
#16 by James Farmer on December 22, 2009 - 1:40 pm
brew:
You should apply for a job with the responsibility of rewriting history to favor the bush disaster.
Indeed, Clinton brought shame to himself and the WH, but I recall repuglicans criticizing various attempts by Clinton to go after OBL as designed to deflect attention from the ML scandal. And don’t forget, the outgoing Clinton administration more or less served OBL up on a platter for Bush, who just ignored the whole thing, including advance warnings of 9/11.
Just admit it, brew, you are partisan wingnut, notwithstanding your oft-assertion to the contrary.
#17 by brewski on December 22, 2009 - 1:43 pm
James,
I will take you answer as being non-responsive.
#18 by Larry Bergan on December 22, 2009 - 2:16 pm
Kind of long winded, when all you have to say is, “HE LIED, HE LIED!”
A couple of other things I just can’t let go here:
If Jim Jeffords hadn’t changed to independent and turned the senate over to Democrats, nothing would have come out about Enron.
The perps of the first WTC bombing were caught and imprisoned under Clinton and when he left office, Bush was told of the high priority of Bin Laden, but nothing was done. In fact, the expert on such things, (Richard Clark), who, unlike any republican, took responsibility very publically by saying “we failed you” even though Cheney ignored him and took over his job as terrorist chief; doing nothing to stop 911.
How many times do we have to keep repeating this stuff?
#19 by Larry Bergan on December 22, 2009 - 2:27 pm
Where we went wrong is not saying NO to the Supreme Court when they picked our president using ridiculous arguments.
#20 by jdberger on December 22, 2009 - 3:05 pm
George W Bush also had the highest approval rating of a president at 90%, ever, James. The highest Clinton ever got was 73%.
You’re right. There’s absolutely no comparison between the two!
Statistics are fun!
#21 by jdberger on December 22, 2009 - 3:06 pm
And what’s the Constitutionally proscribed method to say “no” to the Supreme Court, Larry?
#22 by James Farmer on December 22, 2009 - 3:45 pm
jd:
You are smart enough to read, if I recall correctly, so give my comment another go and try again.
PS. Here is a hint. Focus on the time frame “left office with” and not the entire eight-year term which, you’ll notice, is absent from my comment.
#23 by Larry Bergan on December 22, 2009 - 6:24 pm
jdberger:
The guilty parties in the Supreme Court can be impeached and should have been.
#24 by Cliff Lyon on December 22, 2009 - 7:16 pm
Wars tend to add 20% to presidential approval ratings. This factor alone got him re-elected and just barely.
But any measure, GW Bush was the worse president in history by a long shot.
Brewski LOVES Bush. You’d have to love him deeply, to blame 9-11 on Clinton and forget to mention the The Daily intelligence briefing.
Must we continue to hear this bullshit from the scorned Bush Lovers? Its disgusting.
#25 by Bill W. on December 22, 2009 - 10:57 pm
James, i don’t think I will have to worry about my head exploding here any time soon. I see just as much misinformation coming from you as I do from some of the conservative talk show hosts. The only difference is I think you actually believe what you say is true. You need to part ways with your CNN and MSNBC so you can find real truth not something that is run through the propaganda mill afew times.
#26 by James Farmer on December 22, 2009 - 11:55 pm
Not only do I believe it is true, I know it is true.
PS. I just heard a loud explosion. Better touch your head, Billy W, to make sure it is still there.
#27 by Becky Stauffer on December 23, 2009 - 6:29 am
Overheard yesterday in a shop in Bountiful:
Female employee 1: I’m so scared they’re going to pass healthcare.
Female employee 2: I miss George Bush. Maybe he wasn’t the greatest president ever, but at least he kept the budget under control.
Young male boss walks out of office: Oh GIRLS, I forgot to tell you my wife is bringing lunch in today.
Me: (Saying nothing, but realizing this is Utah, where people are not only woefully uninformed but where men still call women old enough to be their mothers “girls”.)
#28 by cav on December 23, 2009 - 8:35 am
Do we need people?
Can’t we just have voting machines and talking points?
Would make things a lot simpler, wouldn’t it?
#29 by Richard Warnick on December 23, 2009 - 8:51 am
For Becky:
Boy the way Glen Miller played,
Songs that made the hit parade,
Guys like us we had it made,
Those were the days,
And you know where you were then,
Girls were girls and men were men,
Mister we could use a man like Herbert Hoover again,
Didn’t need no welfare states
Everybody pulled his weight,
Gee our old Lasalle ran great,
Those were the days
#30 by Uncle Rico on December 23, 2009 - 9:41 am
Richard- I just used those very same lyrics in something I wrote. You and I must be on the same Karmic frequency.
#31 by Cliff Lyon on December 23, 2009 - 1:49 pm
Reposted by popular demand!
I think there is no American president who comes anywhere near Bush the Less in utter indifference, the attention span of a snail darter, with no inclination to read or to write or to think, utterly venal. Darts thrown at any page of any community’s telephone book would have found us a better president. We will still be suffering from these evil, stupid, and unconstitutional wars for at least a century. Probably very much longer. The rip-tides, the waves, the holocausts that will yet inevitably follow will make our angst, bewilderment and just sheer terror of the present seem like a pale prologue when we experience the karmic horror to come. We can do little, now, to limit or prevent all this. In the play, Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead, based on Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the two dull and stupid men who set in motion the horrific final scene of death of Hamlet, Laertes, Hamlet’s mother, the Queen, the King, and others, are in a small boat, headed for England and, they think, safety. They bear a sealed note, giving them safe conduct, they think. Actually, the note directs that they be immediately killed. One of these two look-a-like’s to Bush the Stupid, turns to the other, and says, “there must have been a time, somewhere in the beginning, when we could have said “No!.” The essence of Shakespearian tragedy, or for that matter the Greeks, is just so. We reach a point where we no longer have the capacity to turn back, to turn around, to repent. These wars that we let this madman lead us into have long since pushed us past the time when we could have said, “No!” Ed Firmage
#32 by jdberger on December 23, 2009 - 3:35 pm
thanks for the compliment, James.
right back at you.
notice that my response didn’t claim to question your assertion, only to add color. thus the ‘fun with statistics’.
#33 by jdberger on December 23, 2009 - 3:41 pm
keep on huffin’ the jenkem, Larry…
#34 by James Farmer on December 25, 2009 - 9:21 am
Actually, jd, while federal judges are appointed for life, they can, in fact, be impeached.
#35 by Larry Bergan on December 25, 2009 - 12:14 pm
Every time jdberger pulls out the jenkem argument, you know he’s got nothin’.