Washington vs. The Rule of Law

Once again, our government is trying to exempt themselves from the rule of law in the name of secrecy. It’s the same as saying that official crimes committed in secret cannot be prosecuted.

FOIA eagleVia Glenn Greenwald, the Obama administration and its allies in Congress are trying to carve out an ex post facto exemption from the Freedom of Information Act in order to hide photographic evidence of U.S war crimes.

President Obama has repeatedly vowed to make his administration the most open and transparent in history. But now he is demanding unprecedented secrecy powers. Last week, the U.S. Senate quietly passed a new bill called The Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act of 2009. Its sole purpose is to suppress the evidence of war crimes committed against “individuals engaged, captured, or detained after September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations outside of the United States.”

Greenwald puts this new exemption from the rule of law in context:

What makes all of this even worse is that it is part of a broader trend whereby the Government simply retroactively changes the law whenever it decides it does not want to abide by it. For decades, we had laws in place authorizing citizens to sue their telecommunication carriers if the telecoms allowed government spying on their communications in violation of the law, but when it was revealed that the telecoms did exactly this, the Congress simply changed the law retroactively so that it no longer applied. For decades, we had laws imposing civil and criminal liability on government officials who engaged in or authorized torture, but when it was revealed that our government did that, the Congress just retroactively changed the law to protect the torturers. And now that courts have ruled that our decades-old transparency law compels disclosure of this torture evidence, the Congress is just going to retroactively change the law — again — this time to empower the President to suppress that evidence anyway.

UPDATE: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has granted a government request to extend the deadline from June 9 to July 9 for filing an appeal against an order to release photographs of detainee abuse.

UPDATE: General Ricardo Sanchez, the former commander of coalition forces in Iraq, called for a truth commission to investigate the abuses and torture which occurred there. The General went on to say that, “during my time in Iraq there was not one instance of actionable intelligence that came out of these interrogation techniques.”

  1. 207.118.61.94#1 by glenn on June 1, 2009 - 12:24 pm

    What will we all that have sworn the Oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic gonna do?

  2. 97.117.48.43#2 by Larry Bergan on June 1, 2009 - 11:45 pm

    Jimmy Carter is causing trouble for his own party again and proving that democrats aren’t sycophants.

    The whole article by Jeremy Scahill is very short, but here is the part Scahill highlighted:

    Regarding calls for prosecution of former Bush administration officials, Carter says:

    I think prosecuting is too strong a word, what I would like to see is a complete examination of what did happen, the identification of any perpetrators of crimes against our own laws or against international law and then after all that’s done, decide whether or not there should be any prosecutions. But the revelation of what did happen is what I think I would support.

  3. 207.118.14.153#3 by Will Jenkins on June 2, 2009 - 7:53 am

    Someday it will become clearer Larry that the politicians that claim to be from one party or the other are simply playing roles that give the illusion of difference to the people. The overall agenda carries on, no matter who is in “charge”. They all protect one another when the people demand justice to a perosn.

  4. 166.2.124.88#4 by Richard Warnick on June 2, 2009 - 8:02 am

    Of course, most people who commit federal crimes simply get indicted by a grand jury, without years of indecision and hand-wringing. Ask Tim DeChristopher!

  5. 12.73.25.63#5 by cav on June 2, 2009 - 10:22 am

    A serious question: Does derangement await anyone who plots a way to veer from the status quo?

    My future depends on your answers. Thanks in advance.

  6. 71.36.73.14#6 by Becky Stauffer on June 2, 2009 - 10:38 am

    Cav,

    I think it depends on the plot. But in any event, you can always claim temporary insanity. Remember the words of Paul Simon:

    I fear I’ll do some damage one fine day
    But I would not be convicted by a jury of my peers . . .

  7. 12.73.18.127#7 by cav on June 2, 2009 - 12:21 pm

    Thanks Becky. The notion that my insanity may only be temporary is indeed heartening.

  8. 207.118.14.153#8 by Will Jenkins on June 2, 2009 - 4:42 pm

    Cav, not so much derangement, but be prepared for a vicious struggle. If you have the sand, you can make the beach. Read the Prince, NOW!

    Everywhere we look in this administration we see the continuing endemic corruption contained in our government, it will not, cannot, be voted away. The alternative is to live under the usurping government that is ruining our currency, and laying us low, all generation’s labors having been reduced to a penury of the bleatings of a bunch of hucksters.

    Newsflash: China takes over the truck side of GM, the tank/hummer building side of GM. This is just incredible, GM is dead and Obama and his “team” and are carving it up, right as we have purchased it. We the People if not outraged are done, stick a fork in it.

  9. 12.73.24.65#9 by cav on June 2, 2009 - 8:28 pm

    Thank you too, Will Jenkins.

    A dear friend, an American Indian, told me recently how when the missionaries made their pitch to the natives, there was the promise – if they converted, they’d be ‘white’ in the afterlife.

    Now, I’ll go read ‘The Prince’. If I can find it in large print.

  10. 207.118.14.153#10 by Will Jenkins on June 2, 2009 - 8:29 pm

    And never fear, our economy will be coming right back to its original moorings as soon as these guys start spending their money.

  11. 207.118.14.153#11 by Will Jenkins on June 2, 2009 - 8:34 pm

    The Prince and the Discourses, Machiavelli.

    Online.

  12. 12.73.18.98#12 by cav on June 2, 2009 - 9:52 pm

    Will, good reporting by Scahill.

(will not be published)