Hat tip to Ed at Dispatches from the Culture Wars for this provocative piece from historians Howard Zinn, published by Common Dreams.
On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed. [snip]
Our citizenry has been brought up to see our nation as different from others, an exception in the world, uniquely moral, expanding into other lands in order to bring civilization, liberty, democracy.
That self-deception started early. [snip]
We see in Iraq that our soldiers are not different. They have, perhaps against their better nature, killed thousands of Iraq civilians. And some soldiers have shown themselves capable of brutality, of torture.
Yet they are victims, too, of our government’s lies.[snip]
We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history.
We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation.
Z
Zinn’s call to rethink patriotism, to claim a new and different kind of patriotism, one that is healthier, more honest, than what we have seen so much in the last few decades resonates with me. The jingoistic, America first chauvinism that has replaced patriotism bothers me.
In the run up to the Iraq war, when Republicans in Congress were so upset that France didn’t back out obvious falsehoods and so they insisted French fries now be known as Freedom Fries. At the time, it seemed an infantile and absurd gesture but in retrospect it seems all the more shameful and callow, an act not of patriots but of willful and spoiled children who cannot stand the thought that they are not the center of the universe. Patriotism such as that is, to my mind, an angry and impudent response to a world that refuses to recognize our self proclaimed exceptionalism.
Throughout our history we have dressed our imperialism in the cloak of democracy – pretending that our actions were about spreading democracy. And all too often we did at the gunpoint.
When John Winthrop declared that his Massachusetts bay colony would be a “city upon a hill” for the world to see, he was laying the foundations for American exceptionalism, for our belief that we would be a unique beacon the world, one so very different than any other nation that had come before. Yet we have not been so very different. We built a worldwide empire through a keen and cunning combination of economic and military power, through keeping a ruthless eye always on the main chance and rarely missing or overlooking an opportunity for gain. We are neither worse nor any better than any of the imperial powers who came before us.
But we must recognize that if we are to survive. We must shed our self-deception and honestly assess and understand who we are and what we have done. While the people of much of the world, including our traditional and long time allies, saw the war in Iraq for what it was – an imperial adventure to control resources and exert our power – how many millions of Americans gladly told themselves it was a noble effort to free the people of Iraq? How many of us remain convinced that the adventure in Iraq is a noble endeavor?
The July 4th just past, saw the usual amount of flag waving and tearful singing of patriotic songs, the usual setting off of fireworks and explosion of red white and blue everywhere one looked. It seems time to reflect anew on our notions of patriotism, to engage in a mindful national discussion of what it means to be an American, to be a patriot. As we look at an America whose democracy has become utterly dysfunctional, a nation waging not one but two failed wars, a nation whose basic infrastructure is in advanced state of collapse, a nation whose economic elite are utterly unwilling to pay taxes and who employ every resource at their disposal to avoid and minimize their taxes, who have convinced themselves and many others that taxes are an evil to be avoided, it becomes increasingly and to my mind despairingly important that we as a people engage in a national dialog about what America must be and can be and how we all must share in the making of that nation.
(Photo above from the hilarious website Awkward Family Photos).





98.202.78.22#1 by Richard Warnick on July 11, 2010 - 9:26 pm
The Awkward Family Photos picture relates to a pet peeve of mine. Why do some people think it’s patriotic to disrespect the United States flag? We do have free speech in this country (unless Senator Hatch gets his constitutional amendment), but you are really ignorant if you think wearing or otherwise defacing the flag demonstrates your patriotism.
63.236.215.66#2 by Dwight Sheldon Adams on July 12, 2010 - 10:44 am
U.S. Exceptionalism should mean that we hold ourselves up above the rules—to a higher, exceptional standard, if we are to be different at all. To most, it seems to mean that we’re an exception to the rules; that, among other things, we’re the only country that can be trusted to engage in “righteous” military action or possess weapons of mass destruction responsibly.
We are ethnocentrism, for while other nations may see themselves as better than us for their peace and equality, we see ourselves as better than them for our wars and inequality (or at the very least in spite of them).
To quote a great man on the topic of patriotism:
However you want to view that, through a religious lens or a humanist one, the message is nonetheless positive: Patriotism is not a product of war. For some of us, patriotism is building up the kingdom of God in our country, but this means one and the same thing for us as it does for the true patriot: Promoting the best, most compassionate, most productively integrated society that we can; promoting active citizenship and unity even when we disagree; perceiving our nation as only the subset of the human race which we have integral influence over, and not as superior to the global whole. These are the things that make us patriots, and whether we are the greatest country on God’s green earth or not matters nothing if we aren’t improving for tomorrow over our failings of yesterday.
–Dwight
166.2.124.88#3 by Richard Warnick on July 12, 2010 - 11:19 am
That’s a great quote, and it explains what may have been the LDS Church’s finest hour. When the Carter administration proposed the MX missile “racetrack” basing scheme, which would have been the biggest construction project in human history, the Church in effect vetoed it. Of course, principle jibed with practical considerations because the MX might have made Utah and Nevada the target of every strategic nuke in the Soviet arsenal.
67.186.233.234#4 by brewski on July 12, 2010 - 1:42 pm
I guess this post answers the question as to whether liberals are less patriotic than conservatives. The strange phenomenon remains is why do liberals get all offended when this is brought up? Looks to me like they should enthusiastically agree with that observation.
166.2.124.88#5 by Richard Warnick on July 12, 2010 - 1:49 pm
I think every American is equally patriotic. We all want what’s best for the country. We just disagree on what’s best.
63.236.215.66#6 by Dwight Sheldon Adams on July 12, 2010 - 2:16 pm
Interesting response to this post, Brewski. Aside from an assumption I don’t want to make, that being that you are a narrow-minded ethnocentric doofus who can’t believe in patriotism in any more than an “I love my Mommy!” kind of way, I can’t quite get what it is you’re trying to say.
Please elaborate. What crazy twist of reason have you discovered to demonize liberals with this time? And how long will it take before you denounce your Republican leanings in contravention to your own arguments? We can only wonder. . .
–Dwight
67.182.202.116#7 by shane on July 12, 2010 - 6:10 pm
Dwight, is there a betting pool?
67.182.202.116#8 by shane on July 12, 2010 - 6:14 pm
Only a panty wasted PC lib-ral would not be patriotic! Ask the people there at the start, when the nation was founded!
67.186.233.234#9 by brewski on July 13, 2010 - 9:47 am
Compare and contrast:
~ Howard Zinn
~ Adlai Stevenson
~ John Gunther
~ Benjamin Franklin
~ Woodrow Wilson
~ Ralph Waldo Emerson
~ William J. Clinton
67.182.202.116#10 by Shane on July 13, 2010 - 10:15 pm
Well, Adlai is wrong, it was not the first to set out to do those things, so i guess the first contrast is a lack of factual correctness.
Having said that, if America has set out to institutionalize equality, how exactly can we do that while pushing American exceptionalism? That isn’t equality.
Following the first comment, Gunther is also wrong. Many societies and countries are founded on both good and bad ideas. America is not exceptional there either.
Franklin then seems to say that he is a citizen of any place were there is liberty, again, America is not special.
Do we really need to go on?
208.122.66.251#11 by Anonymous on October 13, 2010 - 10:02 am
i believe in are patriots and that they are amazing GO PATRIOTS